Calculating the sensitivity and robustness of binding free energy calculations to force field parameters.

Binding free energy calculations offer a thermodynamically rigorous method to compute protein-ligand binding, and they depend on empirical force fields with hundreds of parameters. We examined the sensitivity of computed binding free energies to the ligand's electrostatic and van der Waals parameters. Dielectric screening and cancellation of effects between ligand-protein and ligand-solvent interactions reduce the parameter sensitivity of binding affinity by 65%, compared with interaction strengths computed in the gas-phase. However, multiple changes to parameters combine additively on average, which can lead to large changes in overall affinity from many small changes to parameters. Using these results, we estimate that random, uncorrelated errors in force field nonbonded parameters must be smaller than 0.02 e per charge, 0.06 Å per radius, and 0.01 kcal/mol per well depth in order to obtain 68% (one standard deviation) confidence that a computed affinity for a moderately-sized lead compound will fall within 1 kcal/mol of the true affinity, if these are the only sources of error considered.

[1]  K. Dill,et al.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[3]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Microscopic Dielectric Properties of Cytochrome c from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Aqueous Solution , 1995 .

[4]  P. Charifson,et al.  Novel dual-targeting benzimidazole urea inhibitors of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV possessing potent antibacterial activity: intelligent design and evolution through the judicious use of structure-guided design and structure-activity relationships. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  Limiting assumptions in molecular modeling: electrostatics , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[6]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[7]  Chung F. Wong,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and principal component analysis in free energy calculations , 1991 .

[8]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  B. Roux,et al.  Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[12]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Y. Jan,et al.  Probing Protein Electrostatics with a Synthetic Fluorescent Amino Acid , 2002, Science.

[14]  K A Dill,et al.  Additivity Principles in Biochemistry* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  B. Roux,et al.  The Hidden Energetics of Ligand-Binding and Activation in a Glutamate Receptor , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  E. Alexov,et al.  Incorporating protein conformational flexibility into the calculation of pH-dependent protein properties. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[17]  L. Slipchenko,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Noncovalent Interaction Energies with the Effective Fragment Potential Method: Comparison of Energy Components to Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory for the S22 Test Set. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[19]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[20]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Alexander D. MacKerell Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Plotkin,et al.  A theory for the anisotropic and inhomogeneous dielectric properties of proteins. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[25]  David L Mobley,et al.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  Kenneth M Merz,et al.  Limits of Free Energy Computation for Protein-Ligand Interactions. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Jonathan M. Goodman,et al.  Hydrogen Bonding and π-Stacking: How Reliable are Force Fields? A Critical Evaluation of Force Field Descriptions of Nonbonded Interactions , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Sarah A Harris,et al.  A demonstration of the inhomogeneity of the local dielectric response of proteins by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Prediction of SAMPL3 host–guest binding affinities: evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[31]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Dielectric relaxation in proteins: Microscopic and macroscopic models , 1999 .

[32]  C David Sherrill,et al.  Formal Estimation of Errors in Computed Absolute Interaction Energies of Protein-ligand Complexes. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[33]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[34]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[35]  Rabi A Musah,et al.  Excision of a proposed electron transfer pathway in cytochrome c peroxidase and its replacement by a ligand‐binding channel , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  Chung F. Wong Systematic sensitivity analyses in free energy perturbation calculations , 1991 .

[37]  Barry Honig,et al.  Calculating total electrostatic energies with the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1990 .

[38]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[39]  David L Mobley,et al.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  RATIONALIZATION OF THE DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF COMMON THREE-SITE WATER MODELS IN TERMS OF THEIR FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS , 1998 .

[41]  E. Alexov,et al.  Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[42]  P. Carloni,et al.  Molecular dynamics studies on peroxidases: a structural model for horseradish peroxidase and a substrate adduct. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[43]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[44]  K. Dill,et al.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". , 2009, Structure.