Domain-specific control of semantic cognition: A dissociation within patients with semantic working memory deficits

Background: Semantic cognition depends on (a) semantic representations that code knowledge and (b) executive control processes that regulate access to this information such that relevant aspects are brought to the fore. It is not clear whether this second element, termed semantic control, draws on the same resources as executive processing in other domains. Aims: We investigated the degree of independence between semantic control and domain-general executive function by studying non-semantic executive control in three patients who had semantic control deficits, and problems maintaining task-relevant conceptual knowledge in working memory. Methods & Procedures: Patients completed (a) a phonological working memory task that manipulated executive demands and (b) a series of working memory tasks that loaded a variety of executive functions: updating information, dividing attention, and manipulating the contents of working memory. These tasks featured digits and letters, placing minimal demands on semantic processing. Outcomes & Results: While two patients displayed clear executive deficits on these non-semantic tasks, the third case (patient JB) showed fully intact non-semantic control despite a clear control deficit for semantic tasks. Conclusions: This dissociation suggests that executive control over semantic knowledge relies on partially distinct neural mechanisms to those involved in domain-general control.

[1]  R. Treiman,et al.  In Defense of an Onset-Rime Syllable Structure for English , 1995, Language and speech.

[2]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  What the left and right anterior fusiform gyri tell us about semantic memory. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  David Badre,et al.  Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[5]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[6]  R. Buckner,et al.  Common Prefrontal Regions Coactivate with Dissociable Posterior Regions during Controlled Semantic and Phonological Tasks , 2002, Neuron.

[7]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plays an Executive Regulation Role in Comprehension of Abstract Words: Convergent Neuropsychological and Repetitive TMS Evidence , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Stuss,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.

[10]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Language Processing and Working Memory: Neuropsychological Evidence for Separate Phonological and Semantic Capacities , 1994 .

[11]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[12]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[13]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Semantic adaptation and competition during word comprehension. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  R Treiman,et al.  Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  U Noppeney,et al.  The neural areas that control the retrieval and selection of semantics , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  John Duncan,et al.  Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  D. Lindsley,et al.  25 – Brain Mechanisms of Attention and Perception1 , 1980 .

[19]  J. Jonides,et al.  Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Biber Cognitive Estimation Test. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[21]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  The test of everyday attention , 1994 .

[24]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The Hayling and Brixton Tests , 1997 .

[25]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  C. Davis,et al.  BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[27]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Automatic and Strategic Lexical-Semantics: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Differing Roles of Multiple Frontotemporal Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[30]  L. Rapport,et al.  Validation of the Warrington theory of visual processing and the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[31]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  J. Duncan EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: Brain mechanisms of attention , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[35]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Explaining semantic short-term memory deficits: Evidence for the critical role of semantic control , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  J. Hodges,et al.  Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Selective short-term memory deficits arise from impaired domain-general semantic control mechanisms. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[40]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Taking both sides: do unilateral anterior temporal lobe lesions disrupt semantic memory? , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  K. Patterson,et al.  Deficits of knowledge vs . executive control in semantic cognition : Insights from cued naming , 2008 .

[42]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Elucidating the Nature of Deregulated Semantic Cognition in Semantic Aphasia: Evidence for the Roles of Prefrontal and Temporo-parietal Cortices , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  E. Saffran The Organization of Semantic Memory: In Support of a Distributed Model , 2000, Brain and Language.

[46]  A. Woollams,et al.  “L” is for tiger: Effects of phonological (mis)cueing on picture naming in semantic aphasia , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[47]  Paul H Garthwaite,et al.  Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[48]  M. Hogge,et al.  Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging , 2006, Neuroscience.

[49]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[51]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The Neural Organization of Semantic Control: TMS Evidence for a Distributed Network in Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  The impact of semantic impairment on verbal short-term memory in stroke aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative study. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[53]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[54]  T. Tombaugh Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[55]  S. Belleville,et al.  Effect of normal aging on the manipulation of information in working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[56]  C. Davis N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[57]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Prefrontal Cortical Response to Conflict during Semantic and Phonological Tasks , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Neural Basis of Semantic Memory: Process and content in semantic memory , 2007 .

[59]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating Linguistic Processes in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2022 .

[60]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Heterogeneity of the Left Temporal Lobe in Semantic Representation and Control: Priming Multiple versus Single Meanings of Ambiguous Words , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[62]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  When “happy” means “sad”: Neuropsychological evidence for the right prefrontal cortex contribution to executive semantic processing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[64]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Orienting attention to semantic categories , 2006, NeuroImage.

[65]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: Evidence from naturalistic object use , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Executive Semantic Processing Is Underpinned by a Large-scale Neural Network: Revealing the Contribution of Left Prefrontal, Posterior Temporal, and Parietal Cortex to Controlled Retrieval and Selection Using TMS , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Deregulated Semantic Cognition Follows Prefrontal and Temporo-parietal Damage: Evidence from the Impact of Task Constraint on Nonverbal Object Use , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Semantic Diversity Accounts for the “Missing” Word Frequency Effect in Stroke Aphasia: Insights Using a Novel Method to Quantify Contextual Variability in Meaning , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.