Methodological Problems and Issues in MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A Research.

Personality questionnaires are among the most versatile and user-friendly approaches to personality assessment. This article focuses on methodological considerations in conducting research on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2 ; J. N. Butcher, W. G. Dahlstrom, J. R. Graham, A. Tellegen, & B. Kaemmer, 1989), the most widely used clinical personality instrument. The article addresses ways of identifying methodological problems in research and alerts researchers to potential pitfalls in conducting personality assessment research. The topics addressed include the following : methodological factors addressing the continuity of the MMPI-2 and the original MMPI ; sample selection in MMPI-2 research ; issues concerning test administration ; the application of exclusionary criteria in developing research samples ; methodological factors in processing, reporting, and analyzing data ; developing and evaluating new MMPI-2 scales ; and assessing test bias in personality research.

[1]  S. Hathaway,et al.  MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring , 1989 .

[2]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[3]  C. Prescott,et al.  Abuses of the MacAndrew MMPI alcoholism scale: A critical review , 1989 .

[4]  J. Graham,et al.  MMPI-2 : Assessing Personality and Psychopathology , 1990 .

[5]  Y. Ben-Porath,et al.  Mmpi-A Content Scales: Assessing Psychopathology in Adolescents , 1992 .

[6]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  High school yearbooks: A reply to Schwarz. , 1971 .

[7]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Item response theory : application to psychological measurement , 1983 .

[8]  W. Dahlstrom.  Comparability of two-point high-point code patterns from original MMPI norms to MMPI-2 norms for the restandardization sample. , 1992, Journal of Personality Assessment.

[9]  C. Macandrew.  MAC scale scores of three samples of men under conditions of conventional versus independent scale administration. , 1979, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[10]  S. Hathaway,et al.  The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory, Rev. ed., 2nd printing , 1943 .

[11]  R. L. Greene.  The MMPI-2/MMPI: An Interpretive Manual , 1980 .

[12]  R L Greene,et al.  Criteria for assessing inconsistent patterns of item endorsement on the MMPI: rationale, development, and empirical trials. , 1989, Journal of clinical psychology.

[13]  J. Butcher.  Objective personality assessment;: Changing perspectives , 1972 .

[14]  Y. Ben-Porath,et al.  Failure of Wiener and Harmon Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtle scales as personality descriptors and as validity indicators. , 1990 .

[15]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Code-type comparability of the MMPI and MMPI-2: analysis of recent findings and criticisms. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.

[16]  J. Butcher,et al.  Clinical limitations of three Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory short forms. , 1975, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Racial Bias in the MMPI: A Methodological Review. , 1980 .

[18]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. Graham,et al.  Ethnic differences on the MMPI-2? , 1994 .

[20]  J. Butcher,et al.  A handbook of cross-national MMPI research , 1976 .

[21]  R. Devellis,et al.  Cross-Cultural Translation , 1994 .

[22]  J. Graham,et al.  Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. , 1991, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  J. Butcher.  Clinical personality assessment : practical approaches , 1995 .

[24]  D. G. Lamb,et al.  Effects of two types of information on malingering of closed head injury on the MMPI-2: An analog investigation. , 1994 .

[25]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Advances in personality assessment , 1982 .

[26]  P. Meehl,et al.  Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Y. Ben-Porath,et al.  Contribution of the MMPI-2 content scales to the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depression , 1991 .

[28]  J. Graham,et al.  Comparison of the Wiener-Harmon subtle-obvious scales and the standard validity scales in detecting valid and invalid MMPI-2 profiles , 1993 .

[29]  Y. Ben-Porath.  Cross-cultural assessment of personality: The case for replicatory factor analysis. , 1990 .