Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations.

The authors investigated whether effects of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) are influenced by salience asymmetries, independent of associations. Two series of experiments analyzed unique effects of salience by using nonassociated, neutral categories that differed in salience. In a 3rd series, salience asymmetries were manipulated experimentally while holding associations between categories constant. In a 4th series, valent associations of the target categories were manipulated experimentally while holding salience asymmetries constant. Throughout, IAT effects were found to depend on salience asymmetries. Additionally, salience asymmetries between categories were assessed directly with a visual search task to provide an independent criterion of salience asymmetries. Salience asymmetries corresponded to IAT effects and also accounted for common variance in IAT effects and explicit measures of attitudes or the self-concept.

[1]  J. Bargh Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[2]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[4]  J. Houwer A Structural and Process Analysis of the Implicit Association Test , 2001 .

[5]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[6]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[7]  P. Malinowski,et al.  The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: Evidence for learned basic features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Bless,et al.  When Do Associations Matter? The Use of Automatic Associations toward Ethnic Groups in Person Judgments ☆ , 2001 .

[9]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation , 2000 .

[10]  A. McConnell,et al.  Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes , 2001 .

[11]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. E. Lubow,et al.  The Context Effect: The Relationship Between Stimulus Preexposure and Environmental Preexposure Determines Subsequent Learning. , 1976 .

[13]  A. Markman,et al.  How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  D. Carlston,et al.  Consequences of schemata for attention, impressions, and recall in complex social interactions. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Mark A. Oakes,et al.  Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test. , 2001 .

[16]  E. Reingold,et al.  Visual search asymmetry: The influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  C. Voils,et al.  Taking a look underground : Detecting interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial biases , 2001 .

[18]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Current issues in European social psychology , 1983 .

[20]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  R. Lubow,et al.  Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[23]  M. Schneider-Düker,et al.  Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen: Ergebnisse zur deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role Inventory. , 1988 .

[24]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Heart versus reason in condom use: implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[25]  Manfred J. Schmitt,et al.  Stereotypic ingroup bias as self‐defense against relative deprivation: evidence from a longitudinal study of the German unification process , 2002 .

[26]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[27]  R. Snowden,et al.  Forensic psychology: Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  "Unlearning" automatic biases: the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[30]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  C. Judd,et al.  Spontaneous prejudice in context: variability in automatically activated attitudes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  L. E. Krueger,et al.  Search for a singular word or nonword , 1992 .

[35]  U. Kühnen,et al.  How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East- and West-Germans. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.). , 2000 .

[37]  J. H. Flowers,et al.  How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings? , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Self-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An Individual Profiles Analysis , 2001 .

[39]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Beate Seibt,et al.  The structure of prejudice: associative strength as a determinant of stereotype endorsement , 2001 .

[41]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Implicit Self-Concept and Evaluative Implicit Gender Stereotypes: Self and Ingroup Share Desirable Traits , 2001 .

[42]  S. Yantis Control of visual attention. , 1998 .

[43]  J. Hilton,et al.  Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. , 2003 .

[45]  D. Wentura,et al.  Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[46]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Effects of Stereotypicality and Perceived Group Variability on the Use of Attitudinal Information in Impression Formation , 1996 .

[47]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[49]  Philip Quinlan,et al.  Searching for threat , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  R. Banse,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Double Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Personality Self-Concept: The Case of Shy Behavior , 2002 .

[52]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  The Psychology of Evaluation : Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion , 2003 .

[53]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  G. Peeters,et al.  Relational and informational patterns in social cognition , 1983 .

[55]  D. Wentura,et al.  The “meddling-in” of affective information: A general model of automatic evaluation effects , 2003 .

[56]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Measuring the Automatic Components of Prejudice: Flexibility and Generality of the Implicit Association Test , 1999 .

[57]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  S. Yantis 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[59]  G. Logan,et al.  When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task , 1979 .

[60]  A. Lenton,et al.  Imagining stereotypes away: the moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  R. Hastie,et al.  Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. , 1979 .

[63]  D. Berlyne The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[64]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[66]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[67]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic attention to stimuli signalling chances and dangers: Moderating effects of positive and negative goal and action contexts , 2001 .

[68]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Cognition and the autonomic nervous system: Orienting, anticipation, and conditioning. , 2000 .

[69]  S. Bem The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[70]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[71]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[72]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[73]  K C Klauer,et al.  An unbiased errors-in-variables approach to detecting unconscious cognition. , 1998, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[74]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Using the implicit association test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[75]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Negativity in evaluations. , 1987 .

[76]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[77]  J. Wolfe Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[79]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[80]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[81]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site , 2002 .

[82]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Stigma, Staring, and Discomfort: A Novel-Stimulus Hypothesis. , 1976 .

[83]  T. Kessler,et al.  Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflicts at different categorization levels. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[84]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[85]  D. Wentura,et al.  Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[86]  S. Tipper Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[87]  E. E. Jones Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[88]  A. Elliot,et al.  Prejudice with and without compunction , 1991 .

[89]  B. Teachman,et al.  Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. , 2001, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[90]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[91]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[92]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[93]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[94]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[95]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[96]  M. Steffens,et al.  Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[97]  R. Banse,et al.  Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[98]  A. Greenwald,et al.  The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes , 2001 .