Comparison between Two Digital Panoramic Radiography Techniques for Proximal Caries Detection

Introduction: Although proximal dental caries are very common, clinical examinations cannot detect them all. Panoramic radiography has been widely used in dentistry for both diagnosis and screening. This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy of two digital panoramic radiography techniques in the diagnosis of proximal caries. Methods: A total number of 60 patients referred to a dental radiology center, all had complete dental system and bitewing radiographies, were included. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients. For the first and second groups, CR and DR images were obtained respectively. Images were obtained from the distal of the third tooth to the distal of the eighth. Bitewing images were compared with CR and DR images regarding the detection of caries. Kappa index and chi-squared statistics were employed to analyze the results. Results: There was a high agreement rate between bitewing images and CR (Kappa=0.775) and DR (Kappa=o.762) images in detecting caries. Also no significant difference was shown between CR and DR techniques in the detection of caries (0.543). However, DR and CR images are not efficient enough to be prescribed as the sole imaging technique to detect proximal caries. Conclusion: DR and CR techniques could be good imaging techniques for the detection of dental caries as a companion to clinical examinations.

[1]  S. Bushong.  Radiologic science for technologists , 2013 .

[2]  E. Sote,et al.  A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis on posterior teeth of children seen at a Nigerian teaching hospital. , 2010, African journal of medicine and medical sciences.

[3]  Z Z Akarslan,et al.  A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[4]  U. Arslan,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  James D Bader,et al.  A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. , 2002, Journal of public health dentistry.

[7]  R. Ellwood,et al.  An in vitro Comparison of the Ability of Fibre–Optic Transillumination, Visual Inspection and Radiographs to Detect Occlusal Caries and Evaluate Lesion Depth , 2000, Caries Research.

[8]  K Horner,et al.  The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  M K Shrout,et al.  Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis? , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  D. Minorati,et al.  Digital panoramic radiography: a clinical survey , 1995, European Radiology.

[11]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology. , 1993, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  Downer Mc.  Validation of methods used in dental caries diagnosis. , 1989 .

[13]  C W Douglass,et al.  Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. , 1986, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[14]  C W Douglass,et al.  The use of panoramic radiography in the evaluation of asymptomatic adult dental patients. , 1986, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  Christos Angelopoulos,et al.  A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system. , 2010, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[16]  K. Taylor-Weetman.  COMPARISON OF PANORAMIC AND BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS , 2002 .