Beyond buying: The application of service design methodology to understand adoption of clean cookstoves in Kenya and Zambia

Abstract A shift to advanced cookstoves can bring significant health and environmental benefits, but only with proper and consistent use. Despite this, the empirical evidence of what drives the initial purchase, and in particular, the continued use of advance cooking technologies remains limited. This paper describes two case studies in peri-urban Kiambu County (Kenya) and urban Lusaka (Zambia) where we examine the factors influencing the purchase and use of clean biomass cookstoves over time. We apply service design methodology to build “user journeys” to illustrate the cook’s experience with the technology, from the point of hearing about it, to purchasing it, learning to use it, and making it part of their daily routine. We find that often, the primary factors influencing initial purchase do not motivate people to use the stove regularly in the longer term. From the user-journey mapping, we identify some key behaviour change techniques that could be applied, primarily by cookstove implementers, at different phases in the adoption journey to support users in the process of overcoming behavioural barriers to adopting a new technology. Our findings emphasize that complex factors affect people's decision-making around the purchase and use of clean cookstoves, and highlight the need to carefully map user’s experience to pinpoint where support is most needed in the process of change.

[1]  J. Jaime Miranda,et al.  Behavioral Attitudes and Preferences in Cooking Practices with Traditional Open-Fire Stoves in Peru, Nepal, and Kenya: Implications for Improved Cookstove Interventions , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options , 2011 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[5]  David I. Levine,et al.  The Effect of Marketing Messages, Liquidity Constraints, and Household Bargaining on Willingness to Pay for a Nontraditional Cook-stove , 2014 .

[6]  Shonali Pachauri,et al.  Gender impacts and determinants of energy poverty: are we asking the right questions? , 2013 .

[7]  E. van de Fliert,et al.  Defection, recruitment and social change in cooking practices: Energy poverty through a social practice lens , 2017 .

[8]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  Household Cooking Fuel Choice and Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Developing Countries: A Review , 2014 .

[9]  V.V.N Kishore,et al.  Improved cookstoves in rural India: how improved are they? , 2002 .

[10]  Jacqueline Devine,et al.  Introducing SaniFOAM : a framework to analyze sanitation behaviors to design effective sanitation programs , 2009 .

[11]  Stephen Harrell,et al.  Maximizing the benefits of improved cookstoves: moving from acquisition to correct and consistent use , 2014, Global Health: Science and Practice.

[12]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Brendon R. Barnes,et al.  Behavioural Change, Indoor Air Pollution and Child Respiratory Health in Developing Countries: A Review , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[15]  Srilata Kammila,et al.  Clean and improved cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa : a landscape report , 2014 .

[16]  Elisa Puzzolo,et al.  Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  Christian Bason,et al.  Leading Public Design: How Managers Engage with Design to Transform Public Governance , 2017 .

[18]  O. Masera,et al.  Environmental Burden of Traditional Bioenergy Use , 2015 .

[19]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Energy poverty reduction by fuel switching. Impact evaluation of the LPG conversion program in Indonesia , 2014 .

[20]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  The Indian National Initiative for Advanced Biomass Cookstoves: The benefits of clean combustion , 2010 .

[21]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .

[22]  Elisa Puzzolo,et al.  Protocol - What are the enabling or limiting factors influencing the large scale uptake by households of cleaner and more efficient household energy technologies, covering cleaner fuel and improved solid fuel cookstoves? , 2011 .

[23]  M. Rothschild Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors , 1999 .

[24]  Michael Greenstone,et al.  Up in Smoke: The Influence of Household Behavior on the Long-Run Impact of Improved Cooking Stoves , 2012 .

[25]  Eric A. Finkelstein,et al.  Use of Behavior Change Techniques in Clean Cooking Interventions: A Review of the Evidence and Scorecard of Effectiveness , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[26]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves , 2011 .

[27]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[28]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  F. X. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating the relative strength of product-specific factors in fuel switching and stove choice decisions in Ethiopia. A discrete choice model of household preferences for clean cooking alternatives , 2012 .

[30]  Marc Jeuland,et al.  Preferences for improved cook stoves: Evidence from rural villages in north India , 2015 .

[31]  Joy S. Clancy,et al.  Gender equity in access to and benefits from modern energy and improved energy technologies : world development report background paper , 2011 .

[32]  Empowered Lives Resilient nations Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy Green economy strategy , 2011 .

[33]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  Jenny Roe,et al.  What boosts cookstove uptake? A review of behaviour change approaches and techniques , 2016 .

[35]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.