Professional standards for teachers: a case study of professional learning

This paper analyses the current Australian policy and research context in relation to developing quality teachers. Like other countries, many educational authorities in Australia are developing professional standards for teachers and the evaluation of teachers against those standards as a mechanism for ensuring and extending the quality of teaching in schools. A key policy consideration involves the use of professional standards as tools for extending professional learning and/or for credentialing and appraisal. This paper considers these uses of standards by drawing on an evaluation of Education Queensland's Professional Standards for Teachers pilot. The pilot focused on using a set of standards as a framework for professional learning. Teachers' perspectives on the standards and their intended use, their engagement with the standards during the pilot and the nature of professional learning associated with that engagement are discussed in light of current policy debates about professional standards.

[1]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools, Karen Seashore Louis and Sharon D. Druse. 1995. Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. 272 pages. ISBN: 0-8039-6252-5 (hc); 0-8039-6253-3 (pb). $49.95 (hc); $24.95(pb , 1995 .

[2]  Fred M. Newmann.  Authentic Achievement: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality , 1996 .

[3]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Teacher Learning That Supports Student Learning. , 1998 .

[4]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teaching as the Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice , 1999 .

[5]  Margaret Reynolds.  Standards and Professional Practice: The TTA and Initial Teacher Training , 1999 .

[6]  Lee S. Shulman,et al.  Taking Learning Seriously , 1999 .

[7]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Teacher Quality and Student Achievement , 2000 .

[8]  William Louden.  Standards for Standards: The Development of Australian Professional Standards for Teaching , 2000 .

[9]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence , 2000 .

[10]  S Feiman Nemser,et al.  FROM PREPARATION TO PRACTICE: DESIGNING A CONTINUUM TO STRENGTHEN AND SUSTAIN TEACHING , 2001 .

[11]  Jeannette R. LaFors,et al.  Educating Teachers for California's Future , 2001 .

[12]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[13]  L. Ingvarson.  Development of a National Standards Framework for the Teaching Profession. ACER Policy Briefs. Issue 1. , 2002 .

[14]  Lawrence C Ingvarson,et al.  National professional standards for highly accomplished teachers of science , 2002 .

[15]  L. Ingvarson.  Strengthening the Profession? A Comparison of Recent Reforms in the UK and the USA. ACER Policy Briefs. Issue 2. , 2002 .

[16]  J. Little.  Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work , 2002 .

[17]  M. King,et al.  Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry , 2002 .

[18]  Networking for Teacher Learning: Toward a Theory of Effective Design , 2003 .

[19]  K. Rowe.  The Importance of Teacher Quality As A Key Determinant of Students’ Experiences and Outcomes of Schooling , 2003 .

[20]  Judyth Sachs,et al.  Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or developing teaching? , 2003 .

[21]  Lovat and Chris Mackenzie.  The role of the 'teacher': Coming of age? , 2003 .

[22]  P. Munn.  Developing teachers: the challenges of lifelong learning , 2003 .

[23]  Franz Rauch,et al.  Teacher learning for educational change , 2004 .

[24]  Standards for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics , 2005 .