Aggregating Opinions to Design Energy-Efficient Buildings

In this research-in-progress paper we present a new real world domain for studying the aggregation of different opinions: early stage architectural design of buildings. This is an important real world application, not only because building design and construction is one of the world's largest industries measured by global expenditures, but also because the early stage design decision making has a significant impact on the energy consumption of buildings. We present a mapping between the domain of architecture and engineering research and that of the agent models present in the literature. We study the importance of forming diverse teams when aggregating the opinions of different agents for architectural design, and also the effect of having agents optimizing for different factors of a multi-objective optimization design problem. We find that a diverse team of agents is able to provide a higher number of top ranked solutions for the early stage designer to choose from. Finally, we present the next steps for a deeper exploration of our questions.

[1]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  When do noisy votes reveal the truth? , 2013, EC '13.

[2]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing in complexity: Simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture , 2014, Simul..

[3]  Leandro Soriano Marcolino,et al.  Multi-Agent Team Formation: Diversity Beats Strength? , 2013, IJCAI.

[4]  Marco LiCalzi,et al.  The Power of Diversity Over Large Solution Spaces , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Multi-disciplinary collaborative building design—a comparative study between multi-agent systems and multi-disciplinary optimisation approaches , 2011 .

[6]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Measuring the impact of scale and coupling on solution quality for building design problems , 2014 .

[7]  Leandro Soriano Marcolino,et al.  Give a Hard Problem to a Diverse Team: Exploring Large Action Spaces , 2014, AAAI.

[8]  Marc Schoenauer,et al.  Application of a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm to Topological Optimum Design , 2002 .

[9]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Random Utility Theory for Social Choice , 2012, NIPS.

[10]  John S. Gero,et al.  Tradeoff diagrams for the integrated design of the physical environment in buildings , 1980 .

[11]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early stage design , 2014 .

[12]  E. Hellinger,et al.  Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen. , 1909 .

[13]  Jelle Feringa,et al.  Notes on the potential of simulation for architectural conception , 2008 .

[14]  John Christopher Miles,et al.  Designer Centered Development of GA-Based DSS for Conceptual Design of Buildings , 2003 .

[15]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Optimal Forecasting Groups , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Ulrich Bogenstätter,et al.  Prediction and optimization of life-cycle costs in early design , 2000 .

[18]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Better Human Computation Through Principled Voting , 2013, AAAI.