Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans

The end-state comfort effect (Rosenbaum et al. 1990, 1992, 1993, 1996) predicts that people will grasp an object for transport in a way that allows joints to be in mid-range at the end of the transport. When participants in the present study took hold of a vertical cylinder to move it to a new position, grasp heights on the cylinder were inversely related to the height of the target position, as predicted by the end-state comfort effect. This demonstrates that where people grasp objects can give insight into the planning of movement. In the computational model of motor planning developed by Rosenbaum et al. (1995, 2001) it is assumed that goal postures are planned by a two-stage process of recall and generation. The distinction between recall and generation had not so far been tested. In the present study, the pattern of grasp heights in successive transports was consistent with the view that participants generated a plan the first time they moved the cylinder between two points, and that they subsequently recalled what they had done before, making small adjustments to that recalled plan. This outcome provides evidence for distinct effects of recall and generation on movement planning.

[1]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  M. Arbib Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[3]  M. Arbib,et al.  Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements , 1986 .

[4]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[6]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control , 1992 .

[7]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Plans for object manipulation , 1993 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. , 1995, Psychological review.

[10]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Hand and brain : the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements , 1996 .

[11]  G. Caldwell,et al.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[13]  M. Short,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[14]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  M. Short,et al.  Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[17]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy. Minimising discomfort. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[18]  E. Brenner,et al.  The effect of expectations on hitting moving targets: influence of the preceding target's speed , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  P. Dixon,et al.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[21]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[22]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[23]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J. Smeets,et al.  The relation between task history and movement strategy , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Computational Motor Control and Human Factors: Modeling Movements in Real and Possible Environments , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[26]  R. Johansson,et al.  Development of human precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Claude Prablanc,et al.  Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Development of human precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Frank Marchak,et al.  Constraints for Action Selection: Overhand Versus Underhand Grips , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.