Dynamic collaboration: participant-driven agile processes for complex tasks

Groups and decision makers are increasingly running headlong into complexity as interconnections and interdependencies between individuals and organizations continue to grow, decision time horizons shrink and more work is being performed by distributed teams. These factors are driving up overall problem space complexity and limiting the effectiveness of time-tested decision and collaboration processes. Increases in problem space complexity lead to higher equivocality in collaborative processes and associated products. Electronic collaboration support tools and associated process management schemes have proven successful in many challenging contexts. However, current collaboration process management schemes and tools may not be able to effectively handle more complex tasks. We posit that heightened problem space complexity must be addressed with commensurate process and technological support for collaborative efforts. To achieve truly agile collaborative solutions, we propose Dynamic Collaboration -- a process management scheme that utilizes group consensus, and process evolution via iterative process alignment and product refinement phases to meet the challenges posed by complexity and equivocality.

[1]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Blake Ives,et al.  Applications of Global Information Technology: Key Issues for Management , 1991, MIS Q..

[3]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[4]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ThinkLets: achieving predictable, repeatable patterns of group interaction with group support systems (GSS) , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Athletics in electronic brainstorming: asynchronous electronic brainstorming in very large groups , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Electronic support for large groups , 1994 .

[9]  S. E. Jackson The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams , 1996 .

[10]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Can Make a Difference , 1994 .

[11]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  The Collaboration Engineering Approach for Designing Collaboration Processes , 2007, CRIWG.

[12]  Robert J. Harder,et al.  Application of ThinkLets to team cognitive task analysis , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[13]  Martha L. Maznevski,et al.  Creating value with diverse teams in global management. , 2000 .

[14]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[15]  H. Merisalo-Rantanen,et al.  Gathering innovative end-user feedback for continuous development of information systems: a repeatable and transferable e-collaboration process , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[16]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, AMCIS.

[17]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Communications of the acm , 1989 .

[18]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Dispersed Group Decision Making Using Nonsimultaneous Computer Conferencing: A Report of Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Jerry Fjermestad An Integrated Framework for Group Support Systems , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[22]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A Tale of Two Cities: Case Studies of Group Support Systems Transition , 2005 .

[25]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[26]  R. Schwarz The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches , 1994 .

[27]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Getting to "we" , 2008, CACM.

[28]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  A Business Case Framework for Group Support Technology , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Barrie G. Dale,et al.  Business process management: a review and evaluation , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Integration of E-Collaboration Technologies: research Opportunities and Challenges , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[32]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: A Survey , 2003, Business Process Management.

[33]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Methodology-Driven Use of Automated Support in Business Process Re-Engineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Technological Support for Group Process Modeling , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Earl H. McKinney,et al.  The role of communication values in swift starting action teams: IT insights from flight crew experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Robert Kramer,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1990 .

[37]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[38]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task complexity, problem structure and information actions - Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[39]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[40]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[41]  Gervase R. Bushe,et al.  Appreciative Inquiry with Teams , 1998 .

[42]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[43]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Collaboration Engineering: Designing Repeatable Processes for High-Value Collaborative Tasks , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[45]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[46]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[48]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[49]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[50]  David J. Pauleen Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes , 2003 .

[51]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Intelligent workflow techniques for distributed group facilitation , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[53]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[54]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[55]  Victoria K. Clawson,et al.  The Role of the Facilitator in Computer-Supported Meetings , 1993 .

[56]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[57]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[58]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  A Repeatable Collaboration Process for Usability Testing , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[60]  Roger Schwarz,et al.  The Skilled Facilitator , 1994 .

[61]  Santhosh Kumaran,et al.  On the Duality of Information-Centric and Activity-Centric Models of Business Processes , 2008, CAiSE.

[62]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  Patterns for Effective Management of Virtual Projects: Theory and Evidence , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[63]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[64]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: an empirical investigation , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[65]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Planning for IS applications: a practical, information theoretical method and case study in mobile financial services , 2005, Inf. Manag..