Two techniques of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of fuzzy expert systems

Problems characterized by qualitative uncertainty described by expert judgments can be addressed by the fuzzy logic modeling paradigm, structured within a so-called fuzzy expert system (FES) to handle and propagate the qualitative, linguistic assessments by the experts. Once constructed, the FES model should be verified to make sure that it represents correctly the experts' knowledge. For FES verification, typically there is not enough data to support and compare directly the expert- and FES-inferred solutions. Thus, there is the necessity to develop indirect methods for determining whether the expert system model provides a proper representation of the expert knowledge. A possible way to proceed is to examine the importance of the different input factors in determining the output of the FES model and to verify whether it is in agreement with the expert conceptualization of the model. In this view, two sensitivity and uncertainty analysis techniques applicable to generic FES models are proposed in this paper with the objective of providing appropriate tools of verification in support of the experts in the FES design phase. To analyze the insights gained by using the proposed techniques, a case study concerning a FES developed in the field of human reliability analysis has been considered.

[1]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[2]  K. K. Aggarwal,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of fuzzy and neural network models , 2005, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes.

[3]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Expert system methodologies and applications - a decade review from 1995 to 2004 , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  V. Venkat Raj,et al.  Uncertainty in fault tree analysis: A fuzzy approach , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment , 1994 .

[7]  Thomas Whalen,et al.  Empirical validation of Yager's measure of decision tranquility , 1992, [1992 Proceedings] IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[8]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Model for Taking Into Account Tasks Dependencies in Human Reliability Analysis , 2007 .

[9]  Z W Birnbaum,et al.  ON THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS IN A MULTICOMPONENT SYSTEM , 1968 .

[10]  R. Yager,et al.  Fuzzy models induced by alternative defuzzification methods , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems.

[11]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[12]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Validation of human reliability assessment techniques: Part 1 -- Validation issues , 1997 .

[13]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Chuen-Chien Lee FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL SYSTEMS: FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER - PART I , 1990 .

[15]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  A fuzzy set-based approach for modeling dependence among human errors , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Gianni Bellocchi,et al.  An indicator of solar radiation model performance based on a fuzzy expert system , 2002 .

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..