Unified parasite lactate dehydrogenase and histidine-rich protein ELISA for quantification of Plasmodium falciparum.

There is a need for more objective and quantitative tools to replace microscopy in malaria diagnosis. Emphasis has recently been placed on alternative methods such as immunochromatography-based rapid tests. However, these tests provide only qualitative results. Two bio-molecules, parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and histidine-rich proteins (HRPs), that are released by the intra-erythrocytic stages of the parasite offer certain specific characteristics that could potentially improve malaria diagnosis. In this paper, we describe a protocol for a unified sandwich ELISA that allows for the separate but concurrent measurement of pLDH and HRP biomolecules in aliquots taken from the same samples. Freshly drawn blood from a healthy unexposed adult male was used to serially dilute in vitro cultivated and synchronized ring stage Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Commercially available ELISA formats were modified to allow for the measurement of pLDH and HRP from aliquots of the same samples. The pLDH and HRP levels in the samples spiked with known numbers of infected red blood cells (iRBCs) were measured, and the values were used to generate standard graphs. The standard graphs were used to estimate the numbers of iRBCs in test samples. Serially diluted recombinant proteins were similarly used to generate a calibration curve, allowing for the expression of test results in nanograms of their respective recombinant protein. Levels of pLDH and HRPs were determined by using 1) P. falciparum culture material (cells and medium) 2) P. falciparum infected human blood (N = 6) samples, and 3) plasma from P. falciparum-infected patient (N = 22) samples. The parasite density of all culture and infected patient samples was also estimated by microscopy. Both pLDH and HRP levels correlated positively with the parasite density assessed by microscopy: Pearson correlation coefficient pLDH (r = 0.754, P < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89); HRP (r = 0.552, P < 0.007, 95% CI: 0.16-0.79). The HRPs seem to be released in larger quantities than pLDH (in a ratio of ~1 pLDH:~6 HRP), making the detection of HRP in culture material, blood, and plasma easier. The modified ELISA assay with quantitative measurement of pLDH and HRPs may provide a valuable tool for malaria research and patient management.

[1]  D. V. Vander Jagt,et al.  D-lactate production in erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium falciparum. , 1990, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[2]  T. Wellems,et al.  Genetic mapping of the chloroquine-resistance locus on Plasmodium falciparum chromosome 7. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Violaine S. Mitchell,et al.  Malaria: Obstacles and Opportunities , 1991 .

[4]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Diagnosis of malaria by detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen with a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay , 1994, The Lancet.

[5]  Danny W. Wilson,et al.  False-positive results of a Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2-detecting malaria rapid diagnostic test due to high sensitivity in a community with fluctuating low parasite density. , 2005, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[6]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[7]  A. Kilejian A unique histidine-rich polypeptide from the malaria parasite, Plasmodium lophurae. , 1974, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  R. Leke,et al.  Detection of the Plasmodium falciparumAntigen Histidine-Rich Protein 2 in Blood of Pregnant Women: Implications for Diagnosing Placental Malaria , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  W. Trager,et al.  Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. , 1976, Science.

[10]  C. Wongsrichanalai,et al.  Histidine-Rich Protein II: a Novel Approach to Malaria Drug Sensitivity Testing , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  T Hänscheid,et al.  Diagnosis of malaria: a review of alternatives to conventional microscopy. , 1999, Clinical and laboratory haematology.

[12]  A. Smithyman,et al.  Assessment of Assay Sensitivity and Precision in a Malaria Antibody ELISA , 2003, Journal of immunoassay & immunochemistry.

[13]  P Chiodini,et al.  Immunocapture diagnostic assays for malaria using Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). , 1999, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[14]  D. V. Vander Jagt,et al.  Partial purification and characterization of lactate dehydrogenase from Plasmodium falciparum. , 1981, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[15]  M. Makler,et al.  Measurement of the lactate dehydrogenase activity of Plasmodium falciparum as an assessment of parasitemia. , 1993, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[16]  C. Blanc,et al.  A colorimetric in vitro drug sensitivity assay for Plasmodium falciparum based on a highly sensitive double-site lactate dehydrogenase antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 2001, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[17]  Kamolrat Silamut,et al.  Estimation of the Total Parasite Biomass in Acute Falciparum Malaria from Plasma PfHRP2 , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[18]  A. Voller,et al.  The development and validation of a simple antigen detection ELISA for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. , 1993, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[19]  M. Makler,et al.  A review of practical techniques for the diagnosis of malaria. , 1998, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.