New correlations for predicting pure and impure natural gas viscosity

Abstract Accurate determination of natural gas viscosity is important for successful design of production, transportation, and gas storage systems. However, most of available models/correlations suffer from complexity, robustness, and inadequate accuracy especially when wide range of pressure and temperature is applied. Present study illustrates development of two novel models for predicting natural gas viscosity for pure natural gas (CH4) as well as natural gas containing impurities. For this purpose, 6484 data points have been gathered and analyzed from the open literature covering wide range of pressure, temperature, and specific gravity levels, temperature ranges from −262.39 to 620.33 °F (109.6 to 600 K), pressure ranges from 1.4508 to 29,000 psi (0.0100–199.94801 MPa), and gas specific gravity ranges from 0.553 to 1.5741. Sensitivity analysis on the collected data points through design of experiments algorithm showed that pseudo reduced pressure and pseudo reduced temperature are the most effective parameters as the inputs of the models. The Leverage Value Statistics is applied and doubtful data points are determined. The average absolute relative error and the coefficient of determination of the proposed models for predicting pure/impure natural gas viscosity on a wide range of conditions are 5.67% and 1.87%, 0.9826 and 0.9953, respectively. Reliable accuracy of proposed models in comparison to eight commonly used correlations makes them attractive for possible implementing in natural gas simulation/modeling applications.

[1]  Ehsan Heidaryan,et al.  A new and reliable model for predicting methane viscosity at high pressures and high temperatures , 2010 .

[2]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  On the Viscosity of Natural Gases from Qatari North Field Reservoir , 2010 .

[3]  William D. McCain,et al.  The properties of petroleum fluids , 1973 .

[4]  Anthony R. H. Goodwin,et al.  A MEMS Vibrating Edge Supported Plate for the Simultaneous Measurement of Density and Viscosity: Results for Argon, Nitrogen, and Methane at Temperatures from (297 to 373) K and Pressures between (1 and 62) MPa † , 2009 .

[5]  Masoud Rahimi,et al.  New correlations to predict natural gas viscosity and compressibility factor , 2010 .

[6]  Milad Behjoomanesh,et al.  Assessment of total oil production in gas-lift process of wells using Box–Behnken design of experiments in comparison with traditional approach , 2015 .

[7]  D. B. Burrows,et al.  Viscosity of Hydrocarbon Gases Under Pressure , 1954 .

[8]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory , 2001 .

[9]  G. Vakili-Nezhaad,et al.  Application of Genetic Algorithm to the calculation of parameters for NRTL and Two-Suffix Margules models in ternary extraction ionic liquid systems , 2012 .

[10]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[11]  Ali Danesh,et al.  Comparative study of cubic equations of state for predicting phase behaviour and volumetric properties of injection gas-reservoir oil systems , 1991 .

[12]  B. Aghel,et al.  On the viscosity of natural gas , 2015 .

[13]  Gioia Falcone,et al.  HPHT viscosities measurements of mixtures of methane/nitrogen and methane/carbon dioxide , 2013 .

[14]  Amir H. Mohammadi,et al.  Prediction of sour gas compressibility factor using an intelligent approach , 2013 .

[15]  Manson Benedict,et al.  An Empirical Equation for Thermodynamic Properties of Light Hydrocarbons and Their Mixtures I. Methane, Ethane, Propane and n‐Butane , 1940 .

[16]  V. Vesovic Predicting the Viscosity of Natural Gas , 2001 .

[17]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Viscosity correlations for nonpolar dense fluids , 1964 .

[18]  Marc J. Assael,et al.  Dynamic Viscosity Measurements of Three Natural Gas Mixtures—Comparison against Prediction Models , 2007 .

[19]  George Thodos,et al.  The viscosity of pure substances in the dense gaseous and liquid phases , 1962 .

[20]  Masoud Rahimi,et al.  Viscosity of pure carbon dioxide at supercritical region: Measurement and correlation approach , 2011 .

[21]  Ehsan Sanjari,et al.  An accurate empirical correlation for predicting natural gas viscosity , 2011 .

[22]  E. M. El-M. Shokir,et al.  Artificial neural networks modeling for hydrocarbon gas viscosity and density estimation , 2011 .

[23]  J. Ely,et al.  Thermophysical Properties of Fluids. II. Methane, Ethane, Propane, Isobutane, and Normal Butane , 1987 .

[24]  E. Khamehchi,et al.  Estimation of dynamic viscosity of natural gas based on genetic programming methodology , 2014 .

[25]  Mark J. Anderson,et al.  DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation , 2000 .

[26]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Viscosity Measurements and Data Correlation for Two Synthetic Natural Gas Mixtures , 2010 .

[27]  R. Welsch,et al.  The Hat Matrix in Regression and ANOVA , 1978 .

[28]  Reza Shams,et al.  An intelligent modeling approach for prediction of thermal conductivity of CO2 , 2015 .

[29]  Max Born,et al.  A general kinetic theory of liquids I. The molecular distribution functions , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  Kanei Shinzato,et al.  A Capillary Tube Viscometer Designed for Measurements of Hydrogen Gas Viscosity at High Pressure and High Temperature , 2011 .

[31]  Jiancheng Hu A Reservoir/Wellbore‐Coupling Model for the Pressure, Flow Rate, and Optimum Perforation Distribution in Gas Wells , 2013 .

[32]  E. Vogel,et al.  Viscosity Measurements on Gaseous Argon, Krypton, and Propane1 , 2000 .

[33]  D. Katz,et al.  Viscosities of the Methane-Propane System , 1943 .

[34]  P. Whitcomb,et al.  DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation, Third Edition , 2016 .

[35]  Efficient methods for calculations of compressibility, density and viscosity of natural gases , 2004 .

[36]  Daniel G. Friend,et al.  Thermophysical Properties of Methane , 1989 .

[37]  Marc J. Assael,et al.  Viscosity of Natural-Gas Mixtures: Measurements and Prediction , 2001 .

[38]  Arash Shadravan,et al.  HPHT 101-What Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists Should Know About High Pressure High Temperature Wells Environment , 2012 .

[39]  Soorathep Kheawhom,et al.  Modified genetic algorithm with sampling techniques for chemical engineering optimization , 2009 .

[40]  B. Tohidi,et al.  Viscosity of binary and multicomponent hydrocarbon fluids at high pressure and high temperature conditions: Measurements and predictions , 2013 .

[41]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[42]  M. Ghayyem,et al.  Developing a simple and accurate correlation for initial estimation of hydrate formation temperature of sweet natural gases using an eclectic approach , 2014 .

[43]  J. Geertsma Estimating the Coefficient of Inertial Resistance in Fluid Flow Through Porous Media , 1974 .

[44]  F. E. Grubbs Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples , 1969 .

[45]  Farhad Gharagheizi,et al.  Toward an intelligent approach for determination of saturation pressure of crude oil , 2013 .

[46]  D. A. Jackson,et al.  An automated falling-cylinder high pressure laser-Doppler viscometer , 1985 .

[47]  Mario H. Gonzalez,et al.  The Viscosity of Natural Gases , 1966 .

[48]  E. Vogel,et al.  Viscosity Measurements and Predictions for Natural Gas , 2004 .

[49]  R. P. Sutton Fundamental PVT Calculations for Associated and Gas/Condensate Natural-Gas Systems , 2007 .

[50]  Klaus Lucas,et al.  Die Druckabhängigkeit der Viskosität von Flüssigkeiten – eine einfache Abschätzung , 1981 .

[51]  L. I. Stiel,et al.  The viscosity of nonpolar gas mixtures at moderate and high pressures , 1965 .

[52]  Amin Shokrollahi,et al.  State-of-the-Art Least Square Support Vector Machine Application for Accurate Determination of Natural Gas Viscosity , 2014 .

[53]  Dominic P. Searson,et al.  Evolving toxicity models using multigene symbolic regression and multiple objectives , 2011 .