Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective

Conventional neurorehabilitation appears to have little impact on impairment over and above that of spontaneous biological recovery. Robotic neurorehabilitation has the potential for a greater impact on impairment due to easy deployment, its applicability across of a wide range of motor impairment, its high measurement reliability, and the capacity to deliver high dosage and high intensity training protocols.We first describe current knowledge of the natural history of arm recovery after stroke and of outcome prediction in individual patients. Rehabilitation strategies and outcome measures for impairment versus function are compared. The topics of dosage, intensity, and time of rehabilitation are then discussed.Robots are particularly suitable for both rigorous testing and application of motor learning principles to neurorehabilitation. Computational motor control and learning principles derived from studies in healthy subjects are introduced in the context of robotic neurorehabilitation. Particular attention is paid to the idea of context, task generalization and training schedule. The assumptions that underlie the choice of both movement trajectory programmed into the robot and the degree of active participation required by subjects are examined. We consider rehabilitation as a general learning problem, and examine it from the perspective of theoretical learning frameworks such as supervised and unsupervised learning. We discuss the limitations of current robotic neurorehabilitation paradigms and suggest new research directions from the perspective of computational motor learning.

[1]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[2]  D. Carroll,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. , 1965, Journal of chronic diseases.

[3]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[6]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[7]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  Marcus J. Fuhrer,et al.  Rehabilitation outcomes : analysis and measurement , 1987 .

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[13]  Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement , 1989 .

[14]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[15]  R L Hewer,et al.  Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Krusen's Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 1990 .

[17]  C H Shea,et al.  Composition of practice: influence on the retention of motor skills. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[18]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[19]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[20]  David A. Cohn,et al.  Active Learning with Statistical Models , 1996, NIPS.

[21]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Optimal unsupervised motor learning for dimensionality reduction of nonlinear control systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[23]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  H. Dickson,et al.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[25]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Hanlon Motor learning following unilateral stroke. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Chae,et al.  Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. , 1998, Stroke.

[29]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  P. Holland,et al.  Hippocampal lesions enhance configural learning by reducing proactive interference , 1998, Hippocampus.

[31]  M. Perenin,et al.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect , 1998, Nature.

[32]  T. Carew,et al.  Differential induction of long-term synaptic facilitation by spaced and massed applications of serotonin at sensory neuron synapses of Aplysia californica. , 1998, Learning & memory.

[33]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. , 1999 .

[34]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[35]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[36]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the location of the arm by sight. , 2000, Science.

[38]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[40]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[41]  J. Kleim,et al.  Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[43]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Single-unit activity related to bimanual arm movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  賢二 鈴木 慢性副鼻腔炎に対するrandomized controlled study , 2002 .

[51]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[53]  N. Hogan,et al.  Assessing the Motor Status Score: A Scale for the Evaluation of Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[54]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[55]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[56]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Unsupervised learning of sensory-motor primitives , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[57]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[58]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[62]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[63]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[65]  Sean Commins,et al.  Massed but not spaced training impairs spatial memory , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[66]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[67]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  A Neuroeconomics Approach to Inferring Utility Functions in Sensorimotor Control , 2004, PLoS biology.

[68]  Thomas Preat,et al.  Drosophila long-term memory formation involves regulation of cathepsin activity , 2004, Nature.

[69]  Mark Shelhamer,et al.  Acquisition of context-specific adaptation is enhanced with rest intervals between changes in context state, suggesting a new form of motor consolidation , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[70]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[72]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning , 2004 .

[73]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[74]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[75]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[76]  T. Jones,et al.  Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats , 2004, Synapse.

[77]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[78]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[79]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[80]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[81]  Jiping He,et al.  RUPERT: a Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[82]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[83]  M. Rabadi,et al.  Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[84]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[85]  Dominic E. Nathan,et al.  Should Object Function Matter during Modeling of Functional Reach-to-Grasp Tasks in Robot-Assisted Therapy? , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[86]  W. Harwin,et al.  Midpoint Perturbation Response in Haptically-Guided Movements , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[87]  S. M. Morton,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Locomotor Adaptations during Splitbelt Treadmill Walking , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[88]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[89]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Type of Practice on the Learning and Transfer of a Complex Motor Skill , 2006, Perceptual and motor skills.

[90]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[91]  V. Dietz,et al.  Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[92]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[93]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Generalization of Motor Learning Depends on the History of Prior Action , 2006, PLoS biology.

[94]  Gabor Fazekas,et al.  A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[95]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[96]  P. Gallina,et al.  Design, Implementation and Clinical Tests of a Wire-Based Robot for Neurorehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[97]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[98]  D. Reisman,et al.  Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[99]  Mohamed Abderrahim,et al.  Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[100]  R. Scheidt,et al.  Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[101]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[102]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Enhancing Visuomotor Adaptation by Reducing Error Signals: Single-step (Aware) versus Multiple-step (Unaware) Exposure to Wedge Prisms , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[103]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[104]  R Riener,et al.  Robot-aided rehabilitation of neural function in the upper extremities. , 2007, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[105]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Evolution of motor memory during the seconds after observation of motor error. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[106]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[107]  J.J. Palazzolo,et al.  Stochastic Estimation of Arm Mechanical Impedance During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[108]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A Computational Model of Human-Robot Load Sharing during Robot-Assisted Arm Movement Training after Stroke , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[109]  L Dipietro,et al.  Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[110]  G. Fazekas,et al.  Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[111]  Jiping He,et al.  Design and Control of RUPERT: A Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[112]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[113]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[114]  N. Hogan,et al.  A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. , 2008, NeuroRehabilitation.

[115]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Active learning: learning a motor skill without a coach. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[116]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[117]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .

[118]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[119]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[120]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Performance-Based Adaptive Schedules Enhance Motor Learning , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[121]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[122]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[123]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[124]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[125]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.