Using Identity‐Related Visit Motivations as a Tool for Understanding Adult Zoo and Aquarium Visitors' Meaning‐Making

Abstract  Considerable time and effort have been invested in understanding the motivations of museum visitors. Many investigators have sought to describe why people visit museums, resulting in a range of descriptive categorizations. Recently, investigators have begun to document the connections between visitors' entering motivations and their exiting learning. Doering and Pekarik have proposed starting with the idea that visitors are likely to enter a museum with an “entry narrative” (1996; see also Pekarik, Doering and Karns 1999). Doering and Pekarik argue that these entry narratives are likely to be self-reinforcing, directing both learning and behavior, since visitors' perceptions of satisfaction will be directly related to experiences that resonate with their entering narrative. Falk took these ideas one step further and proposed that—although people have diverse reasons for choosing to visit museums—these diverse reasons tended to cluster around a relatively small number of motivational categories (2006). These categories appeared to be related to visitors' desires to use the museum for fulfilling identity-related needs. Each of us assumes many identities over the course of our life. Some of our identities are enduring and long-lasting; others are more ephemeral and situation-specific; all help us navigate through the complexities of life.

[1]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  Motivational factors and the visitor experience: A comparison of three sites , 2002 .

[2]  Zahava D. Doering,et al.  Questioning the Entrance Narrative , 1996 .

[3]  Nancy Cantor,et al.  A prototype analysis of psychological situations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  E. Sadalla,et al.  The Search for Predictable Settings. Situational Prototypes, Constraint, and Behavioral Variation , 1985 .

[5]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Identity Affirmation through Leisure Activities: Leisure Symbols of the Self , 1992 .

[6]  D. S. Holmes,et al.  Influence of personal and universal failure on the subsequent performance of persons with type A and type B behavior patterns. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  David Anderson,et al.  Entry and Emergent Agendas of Adults Visiting an Aquarium in Family Groups , 2007 .

[8]  Jay Rounds,et al.  Doing Identity Work in Museums , 2006 .

[9]  Jan Packer,et al.  Learning for Fun: The Unique Contribution of Educational Leisure Experiences , 2006 .

[10]  J. Falk,et al.  The Effect of Visitors ‘ Agendas on Museum Learning , 1998 .

[11]  John H. Falk,et al.  Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition , 2005 .

[12]  J. Falk An Identity‐Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning , 2006 .

[13]  Zahava D. Doering,et al.  Exploring Satisfying Experiences in Museums , 1999 .

[14]  Andrea Davies,et al.  Seeking Generic Motivations for Visiting and Not Visiting Museums and Like Cultural Attractions , 1997 .

[15]  Paulette M. McManus,et al.  Topics in Museums and Science Education , 1992 .

[16]  D. M. Samdahl,et al.  Self‐awareness and leisure experience , 1989 .

[17]  M. Snyder The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[18]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[19]  M. Havitz,et al.  Enduring Involvement, Situational Involvement, and Flow in Leisure and Non-leisure Activities , 2005 .

[20]  John H. Falk,et al.  Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning , 2003 .

[21]  Daniel R. Williams Leisure Identities, Globalization, and the Politics of Place , 2002 .

[22]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. , 1985 .

[23]  U. Neisser Five kinds of self‐knowledge , 1988 .