Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE To date, most intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery has occurred using linear accelerators (linacs), although helical tomotherapy has become commercially available. To quantify the dosimetric difference, we compared linac-based and helical tomotherapy-based treatment plans for IMRT of the oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS We compared the dosimetry findings of 10 patients who had oropharyngeal carcinoma. Five patients each had cancers in the base of the tongue and tonsil. Each plan was independently optimized using either the CORVUS planning system (Nomos Corporation, Sewickly, PA), commissioned for a Varian 2300 CD linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with 1-cm multileaf collimator leaves, or helical tomotherapy. The resulting treatment plans were evaluated by comparing the dose-volume histograms, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), dose uniformity, and normal tissue complication probabilities. RESULTS Helical tomotherapy plans showed improvement of critical structure avoidance and target dose uniformity for all patients. The average equivalent uniform dose reduction for organs at risk (OARs) surrounding the base of tongue and the tonsil were 17.4% and 27.14% respectively. An 80% reduction in normal tissue complication probabilities for the parotid glands was observed in the tomotherapy plans relative to the linac-based plans. The standard deviation of the planning target volume dose was reduced by 71%. In our clinic, we use the combined dose-volume histograms for each class of plans as a reference goal for helical tomotherapy treatment planning optimization. CONCLUSIONS Helical tomotherapy provides improved dose homogeneity and normal structure dose compared with linac-based IMRT in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma resulting in a reduced risk for complications from focal hotspots within the planning target volume and for the adjacent parotid glands.

[1]  H. Curtin,et al.  Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  W. De Gersem,et al.  An implementation strategy for IMRT of ethmoid sinus cancer with bilateral sparing of the optic pathways. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Naichang Yu,et al.  Effects of the intensity levels and beam map resolutions on static IMRT plans. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  C. Langer,et al.  Concurrent chemoradiation using paclitaxel and carboplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[6]  L. Dawson,et al.  Recurrences near base of skull after IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: implications for target delineation in high neck and for parotid gland sparing. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Xia,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  D L McShan,et al.  Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Vincent Grégoire,et al.  Rotterdam and Brussels CT-based neck nodal delineation compared with the surgical levels as defined by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  James C L Chow,et al.  Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  M K Martel,et al.  Patterns of local-regional recurrence following parotid-sparing conformal and segmental intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Deasy,et al.  A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: initial results. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M. Robinson,et al.  The role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of parotid tumors. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  James F Dempsey,et al.  Determination and delineation of nodal target volumes for head-and-neck cancer based on patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  K. Ang,et al.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P C Levendag,et al.  A three-dimensional CT-based target definition for elective irradiation of the neck. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Richard Pötter,et al.  Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Fowler,et al.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Jay Burmeister,et al.  Effect of MLC leaf width on the planning and delivery of SMLC IMRT using the CORVUS inverse treatment planning system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[23]  L. Dawson,et al.  Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  C. Perez,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces late salivary toxicity without compromising tumor control in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma: a comparison with conventional techniques. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Daniel A Low,et al.  Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  A. Eisbruch,et al.  Preserved salivary output and xerostomia-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients receiving parotid-sparing radiotherapy. , 2001, Oral oncology.