Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mark Reed,et al. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities , 2006 .
[2] Robin Gregory,et al. Some Pitfalls of an Overemphasis on Science in Environmental Risk Management Decisions , 2006 .
[3] S. Funtowicz,et al. Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[4] Graham T. F. Horn,et al. Using Expert Judgment and Stakeholder Values to Evaluate Adaptive Management Options , 2004 .
[5] J. Ravetz,et al. The post-normal science of precaution , 2004 .
[6] Robin Gregory,et al. Learning as an objective within a structured risk management decision process. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.
[7] Taylor H. Ricketts,et al. Biodiversity, Urban Areas, and Agriculture: Locating Priority Ecoregions for Conservation , 2003 .
[8] Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al. ICT Tools to Support Public Participation in Water Resources Governance & Planning: Experiences from the Design and Testing of a Multi-Media Platform , 2003 .
[9] C. D. Becker,et al. Synergy Between Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Conservation Science Supports Forest Preservation in Ecuador , 2003 .
[10] H. Nowotny. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .
[11] Adrienne Martin,et al. Methods and issues in exploring local knowledge of soils , 2003 .
[12] Robin Gregory,et al. Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: water use planning in British Columbia, Canada , 2002 .
[13] S. Fuller. Governing science: a reply to critics , 2002 .
[14] B. Hobbs,et al. An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy , 2001 .
[15] Anthony Alexander,et al. Fikret Berkes. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 1999. [Book Review] , 2001 .
[16] Mark E. Borsuk,et al. Stakeholder Values and Scientific Modeling in the Neuse River Watershed , 2001 .
[17] R. Gregory,et al. Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions , 2001 .
[18] Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al. Conflict dissolution in the public sector: A case-study , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[19] Ter Ellingson. The Ecologically Noble Savage , 2001 .
[20] C. Folke,et al. REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT , 2000 .
[21] Henry P. Huntington,et al. USING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE IN SCIENCE: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS , 2000 .
[22] S. Yearley. Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study , 2000 .
[23] S. Healy,et al. Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics , 1999 .
[24] F. Berkes. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management , 1999 .
[25] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .
[26] Brian Wynne,et al. Environmental Sociology: Theory and Practice@@@Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective@@@Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology , 1997 .
[27] Douglas J. Buege. The Ecologically Noble Savage Revisited , 1996 .
[28] R. Chambers. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience , 1994 .
[29] Lynn A. Maguire,et al. Resolving Environmental Disputes: a Framework Incorporating Decision Analysis and Dispute Resolution Techniques , 1994 .
[30] R. Gregory,et al. Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values , 1994 .
[31] S. Funtowicz,et al. Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.
[32] Brian Wynne,et al. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .
[33] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .
[34] S. Jasanoff,et al. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .
[35] Ross D. Shachter. Evaluating Influence Diagrams , 1986, Oper. Res..
[36] W. Edwards,et al. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .
[37] Carl J. Walters,et al. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .
[38] Sarah Lichtenstein,et al. Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities , 1967 .
[39] Patrick McAlpine,et al. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.
[40] J. Acheson,et al. Defining and Implementing Best Available Science for Fisheries and Environmental Science, Policy, and Management , 2006 .
[41] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives , 2005, Oper. Res..
[42] Brian Wynne,et al. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .
[43] James Wilsdon,et al. See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .
[44] C. S. Holling,et al. Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .
[45] T. Satterfield,et al. Anatomy of a conflict : identity, knowledge, and emotion in old-growth forests , 2002 .
[46] Peter J. Usher,et al. Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Environmental Assessment and Management , 2000 .
[47] P. Singer,et al. Writings on an Ethical Life , 2000 .
[48] F. Fischer. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .
[49] J. R. Ravets,et al. Post-Normal Science , 2006 .
[50] Paul Nadasdy,et al. THE POLITICS OF TEK: POWER AND THE "INTEGRATION" OF KNOWLEDGE , 1999 .
[51] H. Raiffa,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .