Probabilistically determining the cellular source of DNA derived from differential extractions in sexual assault scenarios.

Sexual assault cases are the type of case that often produces questions about the cellular source of DNA. In these cases multiple findings of microscopy, DNA profiling and presumptive testing need to be considered when addressing source level propositions. In this work, I consider a line of questioning that has been raised a number of times in the recent past, where in court it was disputed that low levels of sperm seen on a microscope slide were the cellular source of the male DNA profile component generated from the sperm fraction of a differential DNA extraction. I demonstrate how the cell scoring results and DNA profiling results can be considered together, in helping address this source level question through the use of Bayesian Networks.

[1]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Simone Gittelson,et al.  Bayesian Networks and the Value of the Evidence for the Forensic Two‐Trace Transfer Problem * , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Paolo Garbolino,et al.  A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  David J. Werrett,et al.  Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.

[5]  Marjan Sjerps,et al.  Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  Remi Wieten,et al.  The interpretation of traces found on adhesive tapes , 2015 .

[7]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  L. Dennany,et al.  An assessment of the subjectivity of sperm scoring. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[9]  A. Davies,et al.  The persistence of seminal constituents in the human vagina. , 1974, Forensic science.

[10]  James Curran,et al.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Elizabeth Noonan,et al.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[12]  Bas Kokshoorn,et al.  A probabilistic approach to body fluid typing interpretation: an exploratory study on forensic saliva testing , 2015 .

[13]  P. Brzoska,et al.  Developmental validation of the Quantifiler(®) HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.