Probabilistically determining the cellular source of DNA derived from differential extractions in sexual assault scenarios.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jonathan Whitaker,et al. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.
[2] Simone Gittelson,et al. Bayesian Networks and the Value of the Evidence for the Forensic Two‐Trace Transfer Problem * , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.
[3] Paolo Garbolino,et al. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.
[4] David J. Werrett,et al. Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.
[5] Marjan Sjerps,et al. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[6] Remi Wieten,et al. The interpretation of traces found on adhesive tapes , 2015 .
[7] Christophe Champod,et al. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[8] L. Dennany,et al. An assessment of the subjectivity of sperm scoring. , 2015, Forensic science international.
[9] A. Davies,et al. The persistence of seminal constituents in the human vagina. , 1974, Forensic science.
[10] James Curran,et al. A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[11] Elizabeth Noonan,et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. , 2010, Human reproduction update.
[12] Bas Kokshoorn,et al. A probabilistic approach to body fluid typing interpretation: an exploratory study on forensic saliva testing , 2015 .
[13] P. Brzoska,et al. Developmental validation of the Quantifiler(®) HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.