The Different Roles of Product Originality and Usefulness in Generating Word of Mouth

This paper explores how the dimensions of new products, specifically, the originality and usefulness of the products, influence word-of-mouth (WOM). In four studies, using lab and field setups, we find that originality and usefulness have different effects on WOM. We show that consumers spread more WOM about original products, but the valence of what they say depends on the usefulness of the product. Therefore, originality enhances the effect of usefulness such that consumers spread relatively more and more positively valenced WOM about original and useful products compared to less original but equally useful products. Conversely, consumers spread more and more negatively valenced WOM about original products that are not useful compared to less original products with the same level of low usefulness. The results indicate that product originality should be managed carefully when developing and positioning new products. Although originality increases buzz, it might lead to negatively valenced WOM when the usefulness of the product is perceived to be low.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[2]  H. Bansal,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context , 2000 .

[3]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[4]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads , 1999 .

[5]  Kathy Hammond,et al.  Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability , 2008 .

[6]  C. Heath,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Emotional Selection in Memes: the Case of Urban Legends , 2022 .

[7]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[8]  Marsha L. Richins,et al.  The Role of Evolvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-Of-Mouth: an Implicit Model Made Explicit , 1988 .

[9]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The NPV of bad news , 2007 .

[10]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes , 1994 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[12]  J. Workman,et al.  Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms , 2004 .

[13]  Bernard Rimé,et al.  Long-lasting Cognitive and Social Consequences of Emotion: Social Sharing and Rumination , 1992 .

[14]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[15]  R. Westbrook.  Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes , 1987 .

[16]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[17]  Andre Bonfrer.  The effect of negative word of mouth in social networks , 2010 .

[18]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Effects of Ad Affect on Advertising Effectiveness , 1983 .

[19]  J. Arndt.  Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[20]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[21]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[22]  D. Berlyne.  Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[23]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence , 2007 .

[24]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design , 1999 .

[25]  Kathy Hammond,et al.  The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study , 2007 .

[26]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[27]  F. Buttle.  Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing , 1998 .

[28]  Christian Derbaix,et al.  Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise ? a pilot investigation , 2003 .

[29]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Product Innovations, Advertising and Stock Returns , 2009 .

[30]  C. Vogt,et al.  The Effects of Integrating Advertising and Negative Word‐of‐Mouth Communications on Message Processing and Response , 1995 .

[31]  L. J. Harrison‐Walker.  The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment As Potential Antecedents , 2001 .

[32]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing , 2005 .

[33]  P. Bone,et al.  Determinants of Word-Of-Mouth Communications During Product Consumption , 1992 .

[34]  Gerrit van Bruggen,et al.  Viral marketing: What is it, and what are the components of viral success? , 2010 .

[35]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Measuring Prices and Price Competition Online: Amazon.com and BarnesandNoble.com , 2003 .

[38]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Expectation Processes in Satisfaction Formation , 1999 .

[39]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis , 1998 .

[40]  Sanjay Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting new product success: Cross-country comparisons☆ , 1996 .

[41]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[42]  Y. Kashima,et al.  Talking about Others: Emotionality and the Dissemination of Social Information , 2009 .