Topographic controls on the leaf area index and plant functional type of a tundra ecosystem

Summary 1. Leaf area index (LAI) is an emergent property of vascular plants closely linked to primary production and surface energy balance. LAI can vary by an order of magnitude among Arctic tundra communities and is closely associated with plant functional type. 2. We examined topographic controls on vegetation type and LAI distribution at two different scales in an Arctic tundra ecosystem in northern Sweden. ‘Micro-scale’ measurements were made at 0.2-m resolution over a 40 m × 40 m domain, while ‘macro-scale’ data were collected at approximately 10-m resolution over a 500 m × 500 m domain. Tundra LAI varied from 0.1‐3.6 at the micro-scale resolution, and from 0.1‐1.6 at the macro-scale resolution. 3. The correlation between dominant vascular species and LAI at the micro-scale ( r 2 = 0.40) was greater than the correlation between dominant vegetation and LAI at the macro-scale ( r 2 = 0.14). At the macro-scale, LAI was better explained by topographic parameters and spatial autocorrelation (pseudo r 2 = 0.32) than it was at the micro-scale ( r 2 = 0.16). Exposure and elevation were significantly but weakly correlated with LAI at the micro-scale, while on the macro-scale the most significant explanatory topographic variable was elevation ( r 2 = 0.12). 4. The distribution of plant communities at both scales was significantly associated with topography. Shrub communities, dominated by Betula nana , were associated with low elevation sites at both scales, while more exposed and/or high elevation sites were dominated by cryptogams. 5. Synthesis. Dominant vegetation, topography and LAI were linked at both scales of investigation but, for explaining LAI, topography became more important and dominant vegetation less important at the coarser scale. The explanatory power of dominant species/functional type for LAI variation was weaker at coarser scales, because communities often contained more than one functional type at 10 m resolution. The data suggest that remotely sensed topography can be combined with remotely sensed optical measurements to generate a useful tool for LAI mapping in Arctic environments.

[1]  G. Christakos.  On the Problem of Permissible Covariance and Variogram Models , 1984 .

[2]  F. Chapin,et al.  FACTORS LIMITING SEASONAL GROWTH AND PEAK BIOMASS ACCUMULATION IN ERIOPHORUM VAGINATUM IN ALASKAN TUSSOCK TUNDRA , 1986 .

[3]  Donald A. Walker,et al.  NDVI patterns and phytomass distribution in the circumpolar Arctic , 2006 .

[4]  C. E. Thorn,et al.  Relationship of Vegetation Distribution to Soil Properties in Kärkevagge, Swedish Lapland , 2004 .

[5]  Donald A. Walker,et al.  Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska , 1994 .

[6]  A. Veum,et al.  Soils of Fennoscandian IBP Tundra Ecosystems , 1975 .

[7]  J. Hicke,et al.  Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies , 2003 .

[8]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[9]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Functional convergence in regulation of net CO2 flux in heterogeneous tundra landscapes in Alaska and Sweden , 2007 .

[10]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[11]  K. Nadelhoffer,et al.  Changes in Live Plant Biomass, Primary Production, and Species Composition along a Riverside Toposequence in Arctic Alaska, U.S.A. , 1996 .

[12]  F. Wielgolaski,et al.  Description of Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems , 1975 .

[13]  E. Rastetter,et al.  PRIMARY PRODUCTION OF AN ARCTIC WATERSHED: AN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[14]  F. Chapin,et al.  Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types , 1991 .

[15]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[16]  M. Williams,et al.  OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING LEAF AREA INDEX IN LOW VEGETATION: APPLICATION IN ARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS , 2005 .

[17]  Paul Grogan,et al.  Deeper Snow Enhances Winter Respiration from Both Plant-associated and Bulk Soil Carbon Pools in Birch Hummock Tundra , 2007, Ecosystems.

[18]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[19]  Jesper Heile Christensen,et al.  Future climate change: Modeling and scenarios for the Arctic , 2005 .

[20]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[21]  K. Gabriel,et al.  The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis , 1971 .

[22]  I. Evans.  Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices by Computer. Report 6. An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping. , 1979 .

[23]  G. R. Shaver,et al.  What is the relationship between changes in canopy leaf area and changes in photosynthetic CO2 flux in arctic ecosystems? , 2007 .

[24]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models , 2010 .

[25]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Modelling Topographic Variation in Solar Radiation in a GIS Environment , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  Relative neighborhood graphs and their relatives , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[28]  L. Spadavecchia,et al.  Upscaling leaf area index in an Arctic landscape through multiscale observations , 2008 .

[29]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns , 2006 .

[30]  F. Chapin,et al.  Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer Warming , 2005, Science.

[31]  J. Welker,et al.  Winter Biological Processes Could Help Convert Arctic Tundra to Shrubland , 2005 .

[32]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[33]  Keith Beven.  Distributed hydrological modelling: applications of the TOPMODEL concept. , 1997 .

[34]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[35]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  Global Change and the Carbon Balance of Arctic EcosystemsCarbon/nutrient interactions should act as major constraints on changes in global terrestrial carbon cycling , 1992 .

[36]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[37]  Larry D. Hinzman,et al.  Energy Balance and Hydrological Processes in an Arctic Watershed , 1996 .

[38]  Mark T. van Wijk,et al.  Tight coupling between leaf area index and foliage N content in arctic plant communities , 2004, Oecologia.

[39]  H. Hotelling.  Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[40]  A. McBratney,et al.  Choosing functions for semi‐variograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates , 1986 .

[41]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[42]  Terry V. Callaghan,et al.  Long‐term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change , 2004 .

[43]  M. Wijk,et al.  Identifying Differences in Carbon Exchange among Arctic Ecosystem Types , 2006, Ecosystems.

[44]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Vegetation characteristics and primary productivity along an arctic transect: implications for scaling‐up , 1999 .