Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology

Significance Given the current species extinction rates, evidence-based policies to conserve at-risk species are urgently needed. Ultimately, the extinction of a species is determined by birth and death rates, which drive populations to increase or decline. Therefore, demographic data are essential to inform species conservation policies or to develop extinction risk assessments. Demographic information provides an indispensable bedrock for insights to tackle species sustainable management and deepens understanding of ecological and evolutionary processes. We develop a Demographic Species Knowledge Index that classifies the demographic information for 32,144 tetrapod species. We found comprehensive information on birth and survival for only 1.3% (613) of the species, and show the major potential of zoos and aquariums to significantly increase our demographic knowledge. Biodiversity loss is a major challenge. Over the past century, the average rate of vertebrate extinction has been about 100-fold higher than the estimated background rate and population declines continue to increase globally. Birth and death rates determine the pace of population increase or decline, thus driving the expansion or extinction of a species. Design of species conservation policies hence depends on demographic data (e.g., for extinction risk assessments or estimation of harvesting quotas). However, an overview of the accessible data, even for better known taxa, is lacking. Here, we present the Demographic Species Knowledge Index, which classifies the available information for 32,144 (97%) of extant described mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. We show that only 1.3% of the tetrapod species have comprehensive information on birth and death rates. We found no demographic measures, not even crude ones such as maximum life span or typical litter/clutch size, for 65% of threatened tetrapods. More field studies are needed; however, some progress can be made by digitalizing existing knowledge, by imputing data from related species with similar life histories, and by using information from captive populations. We show that data from zoos and aquariums in the Species360 network can significantly improve knowledge for an almost eightfold gain. Assessing the landscape of limited demographic knowledge is essential to prioritize ways to fill data gaps. Such information is urgently needed to implement management strategies to conserve at-risk taxa and to discover new unifying concepts and evolutionary relationships across thousands of tetrapod species.

[1]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  Performance of generation time approximations for extinction risk assessments , 2019, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[2]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  The diversity of population responses to environmental change , 2018, Ecology letters.

[3]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Data from: Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology , 2019 .

[4]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Louise McRae,et al.  Priorities for big biodiversity data , 2017 .

[6]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  The emergence of longevous populations , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  An allometric approach to quantify the extinction vulnerability of birds and mammals. , 2016, Ecology.

[9]  Hal Caswell,et al.  COMADRE: a global data base of animal demography , 2015, bioRxiv.

[10]  A. Feldman,et al.  Power in numbers. Drivers of high population density in insular lizards , 2016 .

[11]  Nathan Wilson,et al.  TraitBank: Practical semantics for organism attribute data , 2016, Semantic Web.

[12]  S. K. Morgan Ernest,et al.  An amniote life-history database to perform comparative analyses with birds, mammals, and reptiles , 2015 .

[13]  P. Uetz,et al.  Late bloomers and baby boomers: ecological drivers of longevity in squamates and the tuatara , 2015 .

[14]  A. Feldman,et al.  Squamate hatchling size and the evolutionary causes of negative offspring size allometry , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[15]  Sylvain Moulherat,et al.  Life-history trait database of European reptile species , 2014 .

[16]  J. Clobert,et al.  A database of life-history traits of European amphibians , 2014, Biodiversity data journal.

[17]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Diversity of ageing across the tree of life , 2013, Nature.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  R. Tingley,et al.  Life-history traits and extrinsic threats determine extinction risk in New Zealand lizards , 2013 .

[20]  Janan T. Eppig,et al.  The Vertebrate Trait Ontology: a controlled vocabulary for the annotation of trait data across species , 2013, J. Biomed. Semant..

[21]  Seref Sagiroglu,et al.  Big data: A review , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[22]  Eduard Szöcs,et al.  taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R , 2013, F1000Research.

[23]  Jinzhong Fu,et al.  Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis , 2013, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[24]  R. A. Pyron,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES REVEAL UNEXPECTED PATTERNS IN THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE MODES IN FROGS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  Xin Lu,et al.  Amphibians live longer at higher altitudes but not at higher latitudes , 2012 .

[26]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Towards a vertebrate demographic data bank , 2012, Journal of Ornithology.

[28]  J. Watson,et al.  Barometer of life: more action, not more data. , 2010, Science.

[29]  Hilmar Lapp,et al.  The Primate Life History Database: a unique shared ecological data resource , 2010, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[30]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  PanTHERIA: a species‐level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals , 2009 .

[31]  J. de Magalhães,et al.  A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life‐history traits , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[32]  Ç. Şekercioğlu,et al.  The Worldwide Variation in Avian Clutch Size across Species and Space , 2008, PLoS biology.

[33]  D. Wake,et al.  Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Monnet,et al.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. Thorbjarnarson REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ORDER CROCODYLIA , 1996 .

[36]  R. Shine,et al.  Patterns of survival, growth and maturation in turtles , 1995 .

[37]  Richard Shine,et al.  Patterns of Survival, Growth, and Maturation in Snakes and Lizards , 1992, The American Naturalist.