Question and Answering Made Interactive: An Exploration of Interactions in Social Q&A

With the advancement of Web 2.0 techniques, social question and answering has become a new venue for individuals to seek for information online. Although it has been investigated by a number of works lately, so far still little has been known about how people interact with each other in order to satisfy their information needs in social Q&A. With the aim to understand the patterns of user interactions in the social Q&A context, as well as factors that may affect such kind of back-and-forth communications, in this work we collect over 1,000 question and answering dialogues from Sina Weibo. Statistical analyses including ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, linear regression and independent t-test are performed in order to answer our proposed research questions. Our results demonstrate the importance of studying the interactions in social Q&A given that about half of our collected question-answer pairs are of interactive nature. From the quantity perspective, we observe that questions within more complicated topics, such as "Healthcare" and "Education" generate more interactions. Significantly positive correlation is also noticed between social tie strength and the number of interactions. By manually annotating all interactive answers, we also indicate the importance of weak ties in providing high quality answers and interactions. Based on our results, we proposed potential implications for future design and implementations.

[1]  G. Lauzon,et al.  Itch Severity Scale: a self‐report instrument for the measurement of pruritus severity , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  Luís Sarmento,et al.  Characterization of the twitter @replies network: are user ties social or topical? , 2010, SMUC '10.

[3]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  #TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search , 2011, WSDM '11.

[4]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[5]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[6]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks , 1982 .

[7]  David R. Karger,et al.  Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites , 2012, CSCW '12.

[8]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[11]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Social exchange, social capital and information sharing in online environments: lessons from three case studies , 2008 .

[12]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Rich Gazan Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community , 2006, ASIST.

[14]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective , 2008, ASIST.

[15]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Miles Efron,et al.  Questions are content: A taxonomy of questions in a microblogging environment , 2010, ASIST.

[17]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked Via Social Network Status Messages , 2011, ICWSM.

[18]  Rich Gazan,et al.  When Online Communities Become Self-Aware , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[20]  Christopher Lueg Beyond FAQs: from information sharing to knowledge generation in online travel communities , 2008 .

[21]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Effects of expertise differences in synchronous social Q&A , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[22]  Tsuneaki Kato,et al.  Question Answering Challenge (QAC-1): An Evaluation of Question Answering Tasks at the NTCIR Workshop 3 , 2003, New Directions in Question Answering.

[23]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.

[24]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[25]  Christopher Peter Lueg,et al.  Mediation, expansion and immediacy: how online communities revolutionize information access in the tourism sector , 2006, ECIS.

[26]  Rich Gazan,et al.  Seekers, sloths and social reference: Homework questions submitted to a question-answering community , 2007, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[27]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Factors influencing the response rate in social question and answering behavior , 2013, CSCW '13.

[28]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior , 2010, CHI.

[29]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study , 2011, ICWSM.

[30]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[31]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams , 2010, CHI.

[32]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[33]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Almighty Twitter, what are people asking for? , 2012, ASIST.