Cardiac surgery in nonagenarians: not only feasible, but also reasonable?

OBJECTIVES Changes in the age profile of the population in the western world and improvement in surgical techniques and postoperative care have contributed to a growing number of cardiosurgical patients aged over 90. In periods when transapical and transfemoral aortic valve replacement were done, we aimed at evaluating the outcome of nonagenarians after conventional aortic valve replacement and cardiac surgery in general, and determining perioperative parameters to predict a complicated postoperative course. METHODS Between 1995 and 2011, 49 nonagenarians (aged 91.2±3.1 years) underwent cardiac surgery. A subgroup of 30 patients received aortic valve replacement alone (63%; n=19), in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting (27%; n=8) or other surgical procedures (10%; n=3). Most of the patients suffered from combined aortic valve disease with a mean valve orifice area of 0.6±0.3 cm2 and a mean antegrade pressure gradient of 86±22 mmHg. RESULTS Cardiac surgery in nonagenarians resulted in remarkable postoperative morbidity and an overall in-hospital mortality of 10% (n=5). In the AVR subgroup, biological valve prostheses were implanted in 29 patients. In this subgroup, the length of stay was 2.9±0.9 days in the intensive care unit and 17.0±5.5 days in the hospital. The in-hospital mortality amounted to 13% (n=4). Although several general preoperative risk factors of postoperative complications such as renal failure, low cardiac output syndrome and New York Heart Association Class IV were remarkably more frequent among the patients who died after the operation, the small cohort of non-surviving nonagenarians did not allow for significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac surgery in the very elderly, particularly with regard to aortic valve replacement, carries a high risk of early morbidity and mortality. However, in selected nonagenarians, surgery can be performed with an acceptable outcome. The risk may even be reduced by an individual approach to the procedure. With regard to potential risk factors, the selection of these patients should be carried out very carefully.

[1]  C. Zussa,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with and without combined coronary bypass grafts in very elderly patients: early and long-term results. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  E. Lucenteforte,et al.  Immediate and late outcome of patients aged 80 years and older undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 studies. , 2012, American heart journal.

[3]  J. Gummert,et al.  Cardiac Surgery in Germany during 2010: A Report on Behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , 2011, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[4]  B. Gerber,et al.  Incidence, determinants, and prognostic impact of operative refusal or denial in octogenarians with severe aortic stenosis. , 2011, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[5]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Operative and Middle-Term Results of Cardiac Surgery in Nonagenarians: A Bridge Toward Routine Practice , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  M. Wells,et al.  Cardiac surgery in select nonagenarians: should we or shouldn't we? , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  M. Bacchetta,et al.  Outcomes of cardiac surgery in nonagenarians: a 10-year experience. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Porcine bioprostheses in the elderly: clinical performance by age groups and valve positions. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  R. Lazzaro,et al.  Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in one hundred consecutive octogenarian patients. A multivariate analysis. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.