Biodistribution of Antibody-MS2 Viral Capsid Conjugates in Breast Cancer Models.

A variety of nanoscale scaffolds, including virus-like particles (VLPs), are being developed for biomedical applications; however, little information is available about their in vivo behavior. Targeted nanoparticles are particularly valuable as diagnostic and therapeutic carriers because they can increase the signal-to-background ratio of imaging agents, improve the efficacy of drugs, and reduce adverse effects by concentrating the therapeutic molecule in the region of interest. The genome-free capsid of bacteriophage MS2 has several features that make it well-suited for use in delivery applications, such as facile production and modification, the ability to display multiple copies of targeting ligands, and the capacity to deliver large payloads. Anti-EGFR antibodies were conjugated to MS2 capsids to construct nanoparticles targeted toward receptors overexpressed on breast cancer cells. The MS2 agents showed good stability in physiological conditions up to 2 days and specific binding to the targeted receptors in in vitro experiments. Capsids radiolabeled with 64Cu isotopes were injected into mice possessing tumor xenografts, and both positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and scintillation counting of the organs ex vivo were used to determine the localization of the agents. The capsids exhibit surprisingly long circulation times (10-15% ID/g in blood at 24 h) and moderate tumor uptake (2-5% ID/g). However, the targeting antibodies did not lead to increased uptake in vivo despite in vitro enhancements, suggesting that extravasation is a limiting factor for delivery to tumors by these particles.

[1]  A. J. Tavares,et al.  Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours , 2016 .

[2]  Jie Zheng,et al.  Clearance Pathways and Tumor Targeting of Imaging Nanoparticles. , 2015, ACS nano.

[3]  G. Nolan,et al.  Synthetically Modified Viral Capsids as Versatile Carriers for Use in Antibody-Based Cell Targeting. , 2015, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[4]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Using viruses as nanomedicines , 2014, British journal of pharmacology.

[5]  N. Molino,et al.  Caged protein nanoparticles for drug delivery. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  Z. Abbas,et al.  Side Effects of Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients and Evaluation of Patients Opinion about Starvation Based Differential Chemotherapy , 2014 .

[7]  M. Jong,et al.  Imaging preclinical tumour models: improving translational power , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  Warren C. W. Chan,et al.  Polyethylene glycol backfilling mitigates the negative impact of the protein corona on nanoparticle cell targeting. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  N. Steinmetz,et al.  Biodistribution and clearance of a filamentous plant virus in healthy and tumor-bearing mice. , 2014, Nanomedicine.

[10]  Xiaoyang Xu,et al.  Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[11]  Serena Mazzucchelli,et al.  Assessing the in vivo targeting efficiency of multifunctional nanoconstructs bearing antibody-derived ligands. , 2013, ACS nano.

[12]  P. Sapra,et al.  Monoclonal antibody-based therapies in cancer: advances and challenges. , 2013, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[13]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. O’Neil,et al.  PET Imaging and biodistribution of chemically modified bacteriophage MS2. , 2013, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[15]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Multifunctional Nanoparticles: Cost Versus Benefit of Adding Targeting and Imaging Capabilities , 2012, Science.

[16]  Corwin M. Nycholat,et al.  Glycan-targeted virus-like nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  Warren C W Chan,et al.  The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[18]  Horst Kessler,et al.  Guiding plant virus particles to integrin-displaying cells. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[19]  Michael J Welch,et al.  Nanoparticles labeled with positron emitting nuclides: advantages, methods, and applications. , 2012, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[20]  Nicole F Steinmetz,et al.  Applications of viral nanoparticles in medicine. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[21]  Allie C. Obermeyer,et al.  Rapid chemoselective bioconjugation through oxidative coupling of anilines and aminophenols. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  M. Francis,et al.  Multivalent, high-relaxivity MRI contrast agents using rigid cysteine-reactive gadolinium complexes. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  P. Brown,et al.  Targeting the HER/EGFR/ErbB Family to Prevent Breast Cancer , 2011, Cancer Prevention Research.

[24]  Mark B. Carter,et al.  Cell-specific delivery of diverse cargos by bacteriophage MS2 virus-like particles. , 2011, ACS nano.

[25]  Jesse V Jokerst,et al.  Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. , 2011, Nanomedicine.

[26]  N. Steinmetz Viral nanoparticles as platforms for next-generation therapeutics and imaging devices. , 2010, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[27]  N. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Dual-surface modified virus capsids for targeted delivery of photodynamic agents to cancer cells. , 2010, ACS nano.

[28]  M. Thanou,et al.  Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. , 2010, Pharmacological research.

[29]  Todd E Peterson,et al.  Simplified [18F]FDG Image-Derived Input Function Using the Left Ventricle, Liver, and One Venous Blood Sample , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[30]  Sonny C. Hsiao,et al.  Genome-free viral capsids as multivalent carriers for taxol delivery. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  Sonny C. Hsiao,et al.  Viral capsid DNA aptamer conjugates as multivalent cell-targeting vehicles. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  N. Steinmetz,et al.  PEGylated viral nanoparticles for biomedicine: the impact of PEG chain length on VNP cell interactions in vitro and ex vivo. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[33]  Kristi L Kiick,et al.  Polymer-Based Therapeutics. , 2009, Macromolecules.

[34]  P. Choyke,et al.  Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats. , 2008, Nanomedicine.

[35]  Wei Lu,et al.  In vitro and in vivo targeting of hollow gold nanoshells directed at epidermal growth factor receptor for photothermal ablation therapy , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[36]  M. Pomper,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Metastatic Potential , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  D. A. Capretto,et al.  Receptor-binding, biodistribution, and metabolism studies of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab, a PET-imaging agent for epidermal growth-factor receptor-positive tumors. , 2008, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[38]  M. Francis,et al.  Oxidative coupling of peptides to a virus capsid containing unnatural amino acids. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[39]  Duane E. Prasuhn,et al.  Plasma clearance of bacteriophage Qbeta particles as a function of surface charge. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  M. Young,et al.  Biodistribution studies of protein cage nanoparticles demonstrate broad tissue distribution and rapid clearance in vivo , 2007, International journal of nanomedicine.

[41]  Marianne Manchester,et al.  Folic acid-mediated targeting of cowpea mosaic virus particles to tumor cells. , 2007, Chemistry & biology.

[42]  D. Hicklin,et al.  Monoclonal antibody cetuximab binds to and down-regulates constitutively activated epidermal growth factor receptor vIII on the cell surface. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[43]  Duane E. Prasuhn,et al.  Bio-distribution, toxicity and pathology of cowpea mosaic virus nanoparticles in vivo. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[44]  Jacob M Hooker,et al.  Dual-surface-modified bacteriophage MS2 as an ideal scaffold for a viral capsid-based drug delivery system. , 2007, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[45]  Sek-Man Wong,et al.  Folic acid-conjugated protein cages of a plant virus: a novel delivery platform for doxorubicin. , 2007, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[46]  M. Francis,et al.  Modification of aniline containing proteins using an oxidative coupling strategy. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  A chemical toolkit for proteins — an expanded genetic code , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[48]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. , 2006, Cancer research.

[49]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  Marianne Manchester,et al.  Viruses and their uses in nanotechnology , 2006 .

[51]  M. Finn,et al.  Systemic trafficking of plant virus nanoparticles in mice via the oral route. , 2005, Virology.

[52]  C. Mamot,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunoliposomes significantly enhance the efficacy of multiple anticancer drugs in vivo. , 2005, Cancer research.

[53]  Donald A Tomalia,et al.  Dendrimers in biomedical applications--reflections on the field. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[54]  Francis C Szoka,et al.  Designing dendrimers for biological applications , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  V. Torchilin Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[56]  Damon L. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Drug Loading on the Antitumor Activity of a Monoclonal Antibody Drug Conjugate , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[57]  P. Caliceti,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution properties of poly(ethylene glycol)-protein conjugates. , 2003, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[58]  John E. Johnson,et al.  Hybrid virus-polymer materials. 1. Synthesis and properties of PEG-decorated cowpea mosaic virus. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[59]  Andrew B. Martin,et al.  Generation of a bacterium with a 21 amino acid genetic code. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[60]  Chris J. Adams,et al.  RNA Bacteriophage Capsid-Mediated Drug Delivery and Epitope Presentation , 2003, Intervirology.

[61]  R. Jain,et al.  Absence of functional lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. , 2000, Cancer research.

[62]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[63]  Alan E. Smith,et al.  PEGylation of adenovirus with retention of infectivity and protection from neutralizing antibody in vitro and in vivo. , 1999, Human gene therapy.

[64]  Gert Storm,et al.  Surface modification of nanoparticles to oppose uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system , 1995 .

[65]  R K Jain,et al.  Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. , 1995, Cancer research.

[66]  P. Stockley,et al.  Multiple presentation of foreign peptides on the surface of an RNA-free spherical bacteriophage capsid. , 1993, The Journal of general virology.

[67]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1986, Microvascular research.

[68]  R. Tiwari,et al.  Drug delivery systems: An updated review , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutical investigation.

[69]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Practical theoretic guidance for the design of tumor-targeting agents. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[70]  S. Treves,et al.  Imaging cancer using PET--the effect of the bifunctional chelator on the biodistribution of a (64)Cu-labeled antibody. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[71]  M. Flenniken Protein cage architectures for targeted therapeutic and imaging agent delivery , 2006 .