Sensitivity analysis in the context of regional safety modeling: identifying and assessing the modifiable areal unit problem.

A wide array of spatial units has been explored in current regional safety analysis. Since traffic crashes exhibit extreme spatiotemporal heterogeneity which has rarely been a consideration in partitioning these zoning systems, research based on these areal units may be subjected to the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). This study attempted to conduct a sensitivity analysis to quantitatively investigate the MAUP effect in the context of regional safety modeling. The emerging regionalization method-RECDAP (regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning) was employed to aggregate 738 traffic analysis zones in the county of Hillsborough to 14 zoning schemes at an incremental step-size of 50 zones based on spatial homogeneity of crash risk. At each level of aggregation, a Bayesian Poisson lognormal model and a Bayesian spatial model were calibrated to explain observed variations in total/severe crash counts given a number of zone-level factors. Results revealed that as the number of zones increases, the spatial autocorrelation of crash data increases. The Bayesian spatial model outperforms the Bayesian Poisson-lognormal model in accurately accounting for spatial autocorrelation effects, unbiased parameter estimates, and model performance, especially in cases with higher disaggregated levels. Zoning schemes with higher number of zones tend to have increasing number of significant variables, more stable coefficient estimation, smaller standard error, whereas worse model performance. The variables of population density and median household income show consistently significant effects on crash risk and are robust to variation in data aggregation. The MAUP effects may be significantly reduced if we just maintain at about 50% of the original number of zones (350 or larger). The present study highlights MAUP that is generally ignored by transportation safety analysts, and provides insights into the nature of parameter sensitivity to data aggregation in the context of regional safety modeling.

[1]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[2]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Geographical unit based analysis in the context of transportation safety planning , 2013 .

[3]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  District Variations in Road Curvature in England and Wales and their Association with Road-Traffic Crashes , 2007 .

[4]  S Washington,et al.  An inter-regional comparison: fatal crashes in the southeastern and non-southeastern United States: preliminary findings. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Charlton,et al.  Quantitative geography : perspectives on spatial data analysis by , 2001 .

[6]  Peng Gao,et al.  Regionalization of forest pattern metrics for the continental United States using contiguity constrained clustering and partitioning , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[7]  Marcus P. Enoch,et al.  Spatial models in transport: a review and assessment of methodological issues , 2012 .

[8]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[9]  M. Quddus,et al.  A spatially disaggregate analysis of road casualties in England. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Macroscopic spatial analysis of pedestrian and bicycle crashes. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  M. Quddus Modelling area-wide count outcomes with spatial correlation and heterogeneity: an analysis of London crash data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Bani K. Mallick,et al.  ROADWAY TRAFFIC CRASH MAPPING: A SPACE-TIME MODELING APPROACH , 2003 .

[13]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[14]  Ida van Schalkwyk,et al.  Incorporating Safety into Long-Range Transportation Planning , 2006 .

[15]  Xuesong Wang,et al.  Integrating Trip and Roadway Characteristics to Manage Safety in Traffic Analysis Zones , 2011 .

[16]  P. Jovanis,et al.  Spatial analysis of fatal and injury crashes in Pennsylvania. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Diansheng Guo,et al.  Automatic Region Building for Spatial Analysis , 2011 .

[18]  David J. Martin Extending the automated zoning procedure to reconcile incompatible zoning systems , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Helai Huang,et al.  County-Level Crash Risk Analysis in Florida: Bayesian Spatial Modeling , 2010 .

[20]  I. Thomas Spatial data aggregation: exploratory analysis of road accidents. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Diansheng Guo,et al.  Regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning (REDCAP) , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Metrics of Urban Form and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2005 .

[23]  Alireza Hadayeghi,et al.  Temporal transferability and updating of zonal level accident prediction models. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[25]  George Yannis,et al.  Multilevel modelling for the regional effect of enforcement on road accidents. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Optimal Zoning Systems for Spatial Interaction Models , 1977 .

[27]  Lin Liu,et al.  Reducing MAUP bias of correlation statistics between water quality and GI illness , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[28]  Diansheng Guo,et al.  Constructing Geographic Areas for Cancer Data Analysis: A Case Study on Late-stage Breast Cancer Risk in Illinois. , 2012, Applied geography.

[29]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Development of planning level transportation safety tools using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Jutaek Oh,et al.  Forecasting Crashes at the Planning Level: Simultaneous Negative Binomial Crash Model Applied in Tucson, Arizona , 2004 .

[31]  S Openshaw,et al.  Algorithms for Reengineering 1991 Census Geography , 1995, Environment & planning A.

[32]  Y. MacNab Bayesian spatial and ecological models for small-area accident and injury analysis. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Srinivas S Pulugurtha,et al.  Traffic analysis zone level crash estimation models based on land use characteristics. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Congestion and Safety: A Spatial Analysis of London , 2003 .

[35]  A. Shalaby,et al.  Macrolevel Accident Prediction Models for Evaluating Safety of Urban Transportation Systems , 2003 .

[36]  John W Fischer,et al.  Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act — A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU or SAFETEA): Selected Major Provisions , 2005 .

[37]  B. Everitt The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics , 1998 .

[38]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Transportation Safety Planning: A Spatial Analysis Approach , 2013 .

[39]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.