Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as an implant material.

The biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as a potential implant material was investigated through in vivo studies on beagles. A high-purity alloy was fabricated into prototype bone plates and implanted into the femurs of beagles. Commercial cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy bone plates served as reference controls, an additional control data were obtained from beagles subjected to "sham" operations. The bone plates were removed from the animals and examined after exposures of 3, 6, 12, and 17 months. There was no evidence of either localized or of general corrosion on the surfaces of the bone plates and screws. Gross clinical, radiological, and morphological observations of the tissue at the implantation sites during the autopsies uncovered no signs of adverse tissue reactions resulting from the implants. Histological analyses were performed on samples of muscle and bone adjacent to the implantation sites, and of tissues removed from such organs as the liver, spleen, brain, and kidneys. No significant differences were noted between samples taken from controls and those taken from dogs exposed to the implants. Neutron activation analyses were carried out on suitable samples. The analysis data suggest that there is no metallic contamination in the organs due to the implants; however, there does appear to be some chromium contamination from the Co-Cr alloy implants in the adjacent bone. On the basis of the totality of the data, it is concluded that nitinol alloy is sufficiently compatible with dog tissue to warrant further investigation of its potential as a biomaterial.

[1]  C A Homsy,et al.  Bio-compatibility in selection of materials for implantation. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  A. Ferguson,et al.  Tissue reaction in rabbit muscle exposed to metallic implants. , 1967, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  A. Ferguson,et al.  The ionization of metal implants in living tissues. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  J. Cohen Biomaterials in orthopedic surgery. , 1967, American journal of surgery.

[5]  N K Wood,et al.  The significance of implant shape in experimental testing of biological materials: disc vs. rod. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  J. Galante,et al.  Corrosion-related failures in metallic implants: an experimental study. , 1972, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[7]  R. Oglesby,et al.  The behavior of biological materials at different sites of implantation. , 1968, Journal of biomedical materials research.