Contrasting effects of changing rhythm and content on auditory distraction in immediate memory.

Across 5 experiments, the temporal regularity and content of an irrelevant speech stream were varied and their effects on a serial recall task examined. Variations of the content, but not the rhythm, of the irrelevant speech stimuli reliably disrupted serial recall performance in all experiments. Bayesian analyses supported the null hypothesis over the hypothesis that irregular rhythms would disrupt memory to a greater extent than regular rhythms. Pooling the data in a combined analysis revealed that regular presentation of the irrelevant speech was significantly more disruptive to serial recall than irregular presentation. These results are consistent with the idea that auditory distraction is sensitive to both intraitem and interitem relations and challenge an orienting-based account of auditory distraction.

[1]  E. Elliott,et al.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  How Bayesian statistics are needed to determine whether mental states are unconscious , 2015 .

[4]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[5]  C Alain,et al.  Event-related brain activity associated with auditory pattern processing. , 1998, Neuroreport.

[6]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[7]  N. Morris,et al.  Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[8]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[9]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[10]  G. Bower,et al.  Group structure, coding, and memory for digit series , 1969 .

[11]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach. , 2008 .

[12]  Alan B. Welsh,et al.  Acoustic masking in primary memory. , 1976 .

[13]  N. Burgess,et al.  Temporal Grouping Effects in Immediate Recall: A Working Memory Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  N. Burgess,et al.  Selective Interference with Verbal Short-Term Memory for Serial Order Information: A New Paradigm and Tests of a Timing-Signal Hypothesis , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Alan Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of Verbal Stm by Irrelevant Speech, Articulatory Suppression, and Manual Tapping: Do they have a Common Source? , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? , 1996 .

[17]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[18]  M. Coltheart.  What has functional neuroimaging told us about the organization of mind? , 2011 .

[19]  R. Näätänen.  The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  T. Shallice,et al.  The Organisation of Mind , 2011, Cortex.

[22]  F. Parmentier.  Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  C. Philip Beaman,et al.  Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments , 2005 .

[25]  M. Maybery,et al.  Grouping in short-term memory: do oscillators code the positions of items? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Julie A Fiez,et al.  Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Christopher Jarrold,et al.  Reevaluating key evidence for the development of rehearsal: phonological similarity effects in children are subject to proportional scaling artifacts. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .

[29]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[30]  Z. Diénès.  Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference , 2008 .

[31]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant Sound Disrupts Order Information in Free Recall as in Serial Recall , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[34]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[35]  A Baddeley,et al.  Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory , 2000, Memory.

[36]  Gordon D A Brown,et al.  Modeling age-related differences in immediate memory using SIMPLE. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[37]  E. Elliott,et al.  Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[38]  R Hari,et al.  Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Temporal isolation does not facilitate forward serial recall—or does it? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Satoru Saito,et al.  Rhythmic information in working memory: Effects of concurrent articulation on reproduction of rhythms. , 1998 .

[41]  I. Neath.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  M. Maybery,et al.  Equivalent effects of grouping by time, voice, and location on response timing in verbal serial memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect: Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 1998 .

[44]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Ian Neath,et al.  When does length cause the word length effect? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Ian Neath,et al.  Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[47]  I. Neath,et al.  Modeling distributions of immediate memory effects: no strategies needed? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  S Tremblay,et al.  Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Word Dose in the Disruption of Serial Recall by Irrelevant Speech: Phonological Confusions or Changing State? , 1996 .

[50]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Timeless memory: Evidence against temporal distinctiveness models of short-term memory for serial order , 2006 .

[51]  Z. Dienes.  Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[52]  Deborah M. Shaibe,et al.  On the Irrelevance of Phonological Similarity to the Irrelevant Speech Effect , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[54]  L. M. M.-T..  Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[55]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[58]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[59]  D. Hebb.  Distinctive features of learning in the higher animal , 1961 .

[60]  C Philip Beaman,et al.  The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[62]  Satoru Saito,et al.  The phonological loop and memory for rhythms: An individual differences approach , 2001, Memory.

[63]  D. J. Murray.  Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. , 1968 .

[64]  Esther Ziegler,et al.  Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception , 2009, Cortex.

[65]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: implications for models of serial verbal memory , 2002 .

[67]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  L. Hadlington,et al.  A left-ear disadvantage for the presentation of irrelevant sound: Manipulations of task requirements and changing state , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[69]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. , 1993 .

[70]  C. Jarrold,et al.  The development of rehearsal in verbal short-term memory. , 2013 .

[71]  Clive Frankish,et al.  Modality-specific grouping effects in short-term memory , 1985 .

[72]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[73]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  Nick Mosdell,et al.  The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound , 1997 .

[75]  Erich Schrger,et al.  A Neural Mechanism for Involuntary Attention Shifts to Changes in Auditory Stimulation , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning andmotivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). , 1974 .

[77]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: Further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[78]  F. Parmentier.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review , 2013, Psychological Research.

[79]  T. Picton,et al.  Event‐related brain activity associated with auditory pattern processing , 1998, Neuroreport.