The UMLS-CORE project: a study of the problem list terminologies used in large healthcare institutions

OBJECTIVE To study existing problem list terminologies (PLTs), and to identify a subset of concepts based on standard terminologies that occur frequently in problem list data. DESIGN Problem list terms and their usage frequencies were collected from large healthcare institutions. MEASUREMENT The pattern of usage of the terms was analyzed. The local terms were mapped to the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Based on the mapped UMLS concepts, the degree of overlap between the PLTs was analyzed. RESULTS Six institutions submitted 76,237 terms and their usage frequencies in 14 million patients. The distribution of usage was highly skewed. On average, 21% of unique terms already covered 95% of usage. The most frequently used 14,395 terms, representing the union of terms that covered 95% of usage in each institution, were exhaustively mapped to the UMLS. 13,261 terms were successfully mapped to 6776 UMLS concepts. Less frequently used terms were generally less 'mappable' to the UMLS. The mean pairwise overlap of the PLTs was only 21% (median 19%). Concepts that were shared among institutions were used eight times more often than concepts unique to one institution. A SNOMED Problem List Subset of frequently used problem list concepts was identified. CONCLUSIONS Most of the frequently used problem list terms could be found in standard terminologies. The overlap between existing PLTs was low. The use of the SNOMED Problem List Subset will save developmental effort, reduce variability of PLTs, and enhance interoperability of problem list data.

[1]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  A clinical terminology in the post modern era: pragmatic problem list development , 1998, AMIA.

[2]  Allen C. Browne,et al.  Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[3]  James R. Campbell,et al.  Just-in-time coding of the problem list in a clinical environment , 1998, AMIA.

[4]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Alexa T. McCray,et al.  Research Paper: Evaluating the Coverage of Controlled Health Data Terminologies: Report on the Results of the NLM/AHCPR Large Scale Vocabulary Test , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  S. Fenton,et al.  SNOMED CT survey: an assessment of implementation in EMR/EHR applications. , 2008, Perspectives in health information management.

[8]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  Aggregating UMLS Semantic Types for Reducing Conceptual Complexity , 2001, MedInfo.

[9]  Margaret Edmunds,et al.  BOARD ON HEALTH CARE SERVICES INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE , 1998 .

[10]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[11]  William T. Hole,et al.  Discovering missed synonymy in a large concept-oriented Metathesaurus , 2000, AMIA.

[12]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Standardized problem list generation, utilizing the Mayo canonical vocabulary embedded within the Unified Medical Language System , 1997, AMIA.

[13]  L. Weed,et al.  The problem oriented record as a basic tool in medical education, patient care and clinical research. , 1971, Annals of clinical research.

[14]  David W. Bates,et al.  Automated coded ambulatory problem lists: evaluation of a vocabulary and a data entry tool , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Sam Heard,et al.  HL7 EHR System Functional Model Draft Standard for Trial Use , 2004 .

[16]  R A Miller,et al.  Empirical Derivation of an Electronic Clinically Useful Problem Statement System , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Dick Rs,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: Revised Edition: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1997 .

[18]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Unified Medical Language System , 2020, Definitions.