Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging.

In this report we evaluate an image registration technique that can improve the information content of intraoperative image data by deformable matching of preoperative images. In this study, pretreatment 1.5 tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) images of the prostate are registered with 0.5 T intraoperative images. The method involves rigid and nonrigid registration using biomechanical finite element modeling. Preoperative 1.5 T MR imaging is conducted with the patient supine, using an endorectal coil, while intraoperatively, the patient is in the lithotomy position with a rectal obturator in place. We have previously observed that these changes in patient position and rectal filling produce a shape change in the prostate. The registration of 1.5 T preoperative images depicting the prostate substructure [namely central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ)] to 0.5 T intraoperative MR images using this method can facilitate the segmentation of the substructure of the gland for radiation treatment planning. After creating and validating a dataset of manually segmented glands from images obtained in ten sequential MR-guided brachytherapy cases, we conducted a set of experiments to assess our hypothesis that the proposed registration system can significantly improve the quality of matching of the total gland (TG), CG, and PZ. The results showed that the method statistically-significantly improves the quality of match (compared to rigid registration), raising the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) from prematched coefficients of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.59 for TG, CG, and PZ, respectively, to 0.94, 0.86, and 0.76. A point-based measure of registration agreement was also improved by the deformable registration. CG and PZ volumes are not changed by the registration, indicating that the method maintains the biomechanical topology of the prostate. Although this strategy was tested for MRI-guided brachytherapy, the preliminary results from these experiments suggest that it may be applied to other settings such as transrectal ultrasound-guided therapy, where the integration of preoperative MRI may have a significant impact upon treatment planning and guidance.

[1]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[2]  J. Fleiss Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. , 1975, Biometrics.

[3]  J. Bartko Measurement and reliability: statistical thinking considerations. , 1991, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[4]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1993, Radiology.

[5]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  P L Roberson,et al.  Impact of ultrasound and computed tomography prostate volume registration on evaluation of permanent prostate implants. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M A Moerland,et al.  Evaluation of permanent I-125 prostate implants using radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  G E Hanks,et al.  Initial clinical assessment of CT-MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J. Richie,et al.  Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  C M Tempany,et al.  MR imaging of the prostate and bladder. , 1998, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[14]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  K. Zou,et al.  Higher-moment approaches to approximate interval estimation for a certain intraclass correlation coefficient. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  An Integrated Visualization System for Surgical Planning and Guidance Using Image Fusion and Interventional Imaging , 1999, MICCAI.

[17]  K. Rohr,et al.  Biomechanical modeling of the human head for physically based, nonrigid image registration , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Real-Time Biomechanical Simulation of Volumetric Brain Deformation for Image Guided Neurosurgery , 2000, ACM/IEEE SC 2000 Conference (SC'00).

[19]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Deformable Modeling for Characterizing Biomedical Shape Changes , 2000, DGCI.

[20]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Modeling of Retraction and Resection for Intraoperative Updating of Images , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[21]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  A Novel Nonrigid Registration Algorithm and Applications , 2001, MICCAI.

[22]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3D Intraoperative MR Images of the Brain Using a Finite Element Biomechanical Model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.