Image‐scoring system for crown–rump length measurement

To develop and evaluate an objective image‐scoring system for crown–rump length (CRL) measurements and to determine how this compares with subjective assessment.

[1]  V Hiilesmaa,et al.  Predicting Delivery Date by Ultrasound and Last Menstrual Period in Early Gestation , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  Y. Ville,et al.  Feasibility and reproducibility of an image‐scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  I. Bukovsky,et al.  Nuchal translucency audit: a novel image‐scoring method , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  J. Fleming,et al.  A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SONAR “CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH” MEASUREMENTS , 1975, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  J. Copel,et al.  First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  R. Snijders,et al.  First‐trimester trisomy screening: nuchal translucency measurement training and quality assurance to correct and unify technique , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  A. Papageorghiou,et al.  Pregnancy dating by fetal crown–rump length: a systematic review of charts , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  R. Alpert,et al.  Communications Through Limited-Response Questioning , 1954 .

[11]  D G Altman,et al.  Standardisation and quality control of ultrasound measurements taken in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  G. Yeo,et al.  Evaluation of an objective method of image assessment for first‐trimester nasal bone , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  I. Staboulidou,et al.  Interobserver Variability of the Measurement of Fetal Nasal Bone Length between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 Gestation Weeks among Experienced and Inexperienced Sonographers , 2008, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[14]  Interpreting kappa values for two-observer nursing diagnosis data. , 1997, Research in nursing & health.

[15]  K. Kagan,et al.  ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  Y. Ville,et al.  Quality control of prenatal ultrasound , 2005 .

[17]  Clinical Excellence,et al.  Antenatal care : routine care for the healthy pregnant woman , 2008 .

[18]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation , 1998, The Lancet.