A Comparative Study of Built-up Index Approaches for Automated Extraction of Built-up Regions From Remote Sensing Data

Accurate built-up information is imperative for loss estimation and disaster management after the occurrence of catastrophic events such as earthquake, tornado, tsunami and flood. These catastrophic events leave behind a trail of mass destruction with property and human losses amounting to millions. Once a natural disaster hits a region, built-up information is required within a short span of time for disaster management. Nowadays, earth observation satellite imagery serves as a promising source to extract the land use / land cover classes. However, the automatic extraction of urban built-up from remote sensing data is a known challenge in the remote sensing community. The normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) algorithm has been recognized as an effective algorithm for automatic built-up identification from medium spatial and spectral resolution satellite images. Few researchers have modified this algorithm and proposed new quantitative expressions for the built-up index. In this paper, three built-up index based, unsupervised built-up extraction algorithms have been reviewed and compared. An automated kernel-based probabilistic thresholding algorithm is used to assort the built-up index values, obtained from modified built-up index algorithms, into built-up and non built-up regions for enhancing the efficiency of the built-up detection process. Qualitative assessment of these algorithms involves computation of several parameters including recently developed parameters like allocation disagreement and quantity disagreement, and classical parameters such as error of omission, error of commission and overall accuracy. This paper presents a case study where the algorithms have been implemented on Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) image of the city of Delhi and its surrounding areas for detection of built-up regions automatically.

[1]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[2]  P. Shi,et al.  Improving the normalized difference built-up index to map urban built-up areas using a semiautomatic segmentation approach , 2009 .

[3]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: Statistical and artificial neural network approaches , 2001 .

[4]  Chad Hendrix,et al.  A Comparison of Urban Mapping Methods Using High-Resolution Digital Imagery , 2003 .

[5]  D. Roberts,et al.  Use of Normalized Difference Water Index for monitoring live fuel moisture , 2005 .

[6]  Charalambos Kontoes,et al.  Operational land cover change detection using change vector analysis , 2008 .

[7]  P. Gong,et al.  Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis , 2003 .

[8]  R. Pontius,et al.  Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[9]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Integrating Contextual Information with per-Pixel Classification for Improved Land Cover Classification , 2000 .

[10]  X. H,et al.  A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery , 2008 .

[11]  Hu Wei,et al.  Extract residential areas automatically by New Built-up Index , 2010, 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics.

[12]  Jinfei Wang,et al.  A rule-based urban land use inferring method for fine-resolution multispectral imagery , 2003 .

[13]  Avnish Varshney,et al.  Improved NDBI differencing algorithm for built-up regions change detection from remote-sensing data: an automated approach , 2013 .

[14]  Manoj K. Arora,et al.  Median change vector analysis algorithm for land-use land-cover change detection from remote-sensing data , 2012 .

[15]  Jay Gao,et al.  Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery , 2003 .