Context dependence in the symbiosis between Dictyostelium discoideum and Paraburkholderia

Symbiotic interactions change with environmental context. Measuring these context-dependent effects in hosts and symbionts is critical to determining the nature of symbiotic interactions. We investigated context-dependence in the symbiosis between social amoeba hosts and their inedible Paraburkholderia bacterial symbionts, where the context is the abundance of host food bacteria. Paraburkholderia have been shown to harm hosts dispersed to food-rich environments, but aid hosts dispersed to food-poor environments by allowing hosts to carry food bacteria. Through measuring symbiont density and host spore production, we show that this food context matters in three other ways. First, it matters for symbionts, who suffer a greater cost from competition with food bacteria in the food-rich context. Second, it matters for host-symbiont conflict, changing how symbiont density negatively impacts host spore production. Third, data-based simulations show that symbiosis often provides a long-term fitness advantage for hosts after rounds of growth and dispersal in variable food-contexts, especially when conditions are harsh with little food. These results show how food context can have many consequences for the Dictyostelium-Paraburkholderia symbiosis and that both sides can frequently benefit. Impact Statement Many organisms form symbiotic relationships with other species. These symbioses often exhibit context-dependence, where the sign or magnitude of one partner’s effect on the other will change in different environments. Context-dependent effects make it difficult to assign interactions to categories like mutualisms or antagonisms because they involve both benefits and costs depending on the environment. However, in some cases, accounting for context-dependence can clarify an interaction so that it more easily fits a mutualism or antagonism. We investigated context-dependence using the symbiosis between Dictyostelium discoideum and two symbiotic Paraburkholderia species. In this symbiosis, Paraburkholderia bacteria allow hosts to carry food bacteria to food-poor contexts, where hosts rarely survive without food, but reduce host fitness in the more hospitable food-rich contexts. The effect of food context on Paraburkholderia symbionts is unknown. We show that Paraburkholderia symbionts are also affected by this context, through facing reduced competition after being dispersed by hosts to food-poor contexts. We also identify a new way that symbionts affect hosts, where symbiont density reduces host fitness, but less so in food-poor contexts. Finally, we use simulations to show that infected hosts benefit in the long-term across variable food contexts, especially in the harshest environments with little food. These results show that context-dependence in symbiosis can have many consequences for hosts and symbionts, though in general for D. discoideum and Paraburkholderia, both are likely to benefit.

[1]  M. Rillig,et al.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in arbuscular mycorrhiza associating angiosperms. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[2]  M. Rillig,et al.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in arbuscular mycorrhiza associating angiosperms. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[3]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Novel Chlamydiae and Amoebophilus endosymbionts are prevalent in wild isolates of the model social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Novel Chlamydiae and Amoebophilus endosymbionts are prevalent in wild isolates of the model social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  Susanne DiSalvo,et al.  Paraburkholderia Symbionts Display Variable Infection Patterns That Are Not Predictive of Amoeba Host Outcomes , 2020, Genes.

[6]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Endosymbiotic adaptations in three new bacterial species associated with Dictyostelium discoideum: Paraburkholderia agricolaris sp. nov., Paraburkholderia hayleyella sp. nov., and Paraburkholderia bonniea sp. nov , 2020, PeerJ.

[7]  S. Iwai,et al.  Photosynthetic Endosymbionts Benefit from Host’s Phagotrophy, Including Predation on Potential Competitors , 2019, Current Biology.

[8]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fitness costs and benefits vary for two facultative Burkholderia symbionts of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[9]  J. Strassmann,et al.  The specificity of Burkholderia symbionts in the social amoeba farming symbiosis: Prevalence, species, genetic and phenotypic diversity , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[10]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis between social amoebae and bacteria , 2018, eLife.

[11]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Diversity of Free-Living Environmental Bacteria and Their Interactions With a Bactivorous Amoeba , 2018, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

[12]  J. Jose,et al.  Direct optical density determination of bacterial cultures in microplates for high-throughput screening applications. , 2018, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[13]  T. Haselkorn,et al.  Intracellular Burkholderia Symbionts induce extracellular secondary infections; driving diverse host outcomes that vary by genotype and environment , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[14]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria use chemotaxis to find social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum hosts , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[15]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria use chemotaxis to find social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum hosts , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[16]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Endosymbiosis: The feeling is not mutual. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Endosymbiosis: The feeling is not mutual. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Primrose J. Boynton,et al.  Evidence for microbial local adaptation in nature , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[19]  J. Wolf,et al.  A polychromatic ‘greenbeard' locus determines patterns of cooperation in a social amoeba , 2017, Nature Communications.

[20]  C. Lowe,et al.  Shining a Light on Exploitative Host Control in a Photosynthetic Endosymbiosis , 2016, Current Biology.

[21]  Klaudia Frankfurter,et al.  The Coevolutionary Process , 2016 .

[22]  Klaudia Frankfurter,et al.  The Coevolutionary Process , 2016 .

[23]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Which phenotypic traits of Dictyostelium discoideum farmers are conferred by their bacterial symbionts? , 2016, Symbiosis.

[24]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria infectiously induce the proto-farming symbiosis of Dictyostelium amoebae and food bacteria , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Clare Marx,et al.  Shining a light , 2015 .

[26]  S. Engen,et al.  The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  S. Engen,et al.  The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  N. Gerardo,et al.  The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit? , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[29]  N. Gerardo,et al.  The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit? , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[30]  J. Bronstein,et al.  How context dependent are species interactions? , 2014, Ecology letters.

[31]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fruiting bodies of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum increase spore transport by Drosophila , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[32]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fruiting bodies of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum increase spore transport by Drosophila , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[33]  LekbergYlva,et al.  Integrating physiological, community, and evolutionary perspectives on the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis1 , 2014 .

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[36]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[37]  J. Strassmann,et al.  The Rate and Effects of Spontaneous Mutation on Fitness Traits in the Social Amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[38]  P. Fey,et al.  One stop shop for everything Dictyostelium: dictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center in 2012. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[39]  J. Starrfelt,et al.  Bet‐hedging—a triple trade‐off between means, variances and correlations , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  J. Starrfelt,et al.  Bet‐hedging—a triple trade‐off between means, variances and correlations , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[41]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba , 2011, Nature.

[42]  Angela E. Douglas,et al.  The Symbiotic Habit , 2010 .

[43]  Angela E. Douglas,et al.  The Symbiotic Habit , 2010 .

[44]  N. Moran,et al.  Facultative symbionts in aphids and the horizontal transfer of ecologically important traits. , 2010, Annual review of entomology.

[45]  Mike S. Fowler,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary dynamics under coloured environmental variation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Mike S. Fowler,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary dynamics under coloured environmental variation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Jason B. Wolf,et al.  Quantification of Social Behavior in D. discoideum Reveals Complex Fixed and Facultative Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[48]  N. Moran,et al.  Colloquium Papers: Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity , 2007 .

[49]  N. Moran,et al.  Colloquium Papers: Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity , 2007 .

[50]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[51]  I M Young,et al.  Interactions and Self-Organization in the Soil-Microbe Complex , 2004, Science.

[52]  I M Young,et al.  Interactions and Self-Organization in the Soil-Microbe Complex , 2004, Science.

[53]  H. B. Suthers Ground-feeding migratory songbirds as cellular slime mold distribution vectors , 1985, Oecologia.

[54]  H. B. Suthers Ground-feeding migratory songbirds as cellular slime mold distribution vectors , 1985, Oecologia.

[55]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection , 2004 .

[56]  J. Merilä,et al.  Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits , 2001 .

[57]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[58]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[59]  P. Fisher Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity: Richard H. Kessin. Bibliography by Jakob Franke, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Publication Date: 11th January, 2001. xiv+294 pp. ISBN 0-521-58364-0 (hardback). Price: £55.00 (US$90.00) , 2001 .

[60]  R. Kessin Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[61]  J. Bronstein Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  J. Bronstein Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  T. Philippi,et al.  Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[64]  T. Philippi,et al.  Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  Joel P. Brockman,et al.  What is Bet-Hedging , 1987 .

[66]  J. Bonner Evolutionary Strategies and Developmental Constraints in the Cellular Slime Molds , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[67]  F. Kuserk THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CELLULAR SLIME MOLDS AND BACTERIA IN FOREST SOIL , 1980 .

[68]  M. Slatkin Hedging one's evolutionary bets , 1974, Nature.

[69]  M. Slatkin Hedging one's evolutionary bets , 1974, Nature.

[70]  in is context-dependent. , 2022 .