Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework

That people find curved contours and lines more pleasurable than straight ones is a recurrent observation in the aesthetic literature. Although such observation has been tested sporadically throughout the history of scientific psychology, only during the last decade has it been the object of systematic research. Recent studies lend support to the idea that human preference for curved contours is biologically determined. However, it has also been argued that this preference is a cultural phenomenon. In this article, we review the available evidence, together with different attempts to explain the nature of preference for curvature: sensoriomotor-based and valuation-based approaches. We also argue that the lack of a unifying framework and clearly defined concepts might be undermining our efforts towards a better understanding of the nature of preference for curvature. Finally, we point to a series of unresolved matters as the starting point to further develop a consistent research program.

[1]  P. Ekman Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life , 2003 .

[2]  K. Hevner,et al.  Experimental studies of the affective value of colors and lines. , 1935 .

[3]  L. J. Martin An experimental study of Fechner's principles of aesthetics , 2011 .

[4]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[5]  M. Bar,et al.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Paul C. Quinn,et al.  Perceptual organization of complex visual configurations by young infants , 1997 .

[7]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[8]  An introduction to the experimental psychology of beauty , 1913 .

[9]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  George Santayana,et al.  The Sense of Beauty; Being the Outline of Aesthetic Theory , 1996 .

[11]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Steve J. Westerman,et al.  Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design Elements , 2012 .

[13]  I. Child,et al.  Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Moshe Bar,et al.  The proactive brain: Using rudimentary information to make predictive judgments , 2008 .

[15]  Essays: Moral, Political and Aesthetic , 1865 .

[16]  U. Hess,et al.  How Shapes Influence Social Judgments , 2013 .

[17]  Lester M. Hyman,et al.  Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. , 1992 .

[18]  Vasanti Jadva,et al.  Infants’ Preferences for Toys, Colors, and Shapes: Sex Differences and Similarities , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[19]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[20]  Gordon H. Orians,et al.  The biological origins of art , 2000 .

[21]  Christine L Larson,et al.  The shape of threat: simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. , 2007, Emotion.

[22]  Tamara N. Gheorghes,et al.  Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[23]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design , 2005 .

[24]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  N. Block Consciousness, Big Science and Conceptual Clarity , 2014 .

[26]  M. Wiener,et al.  Subliminal perception or perception of partial cue with pictorial stimuli. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  C. Carbon The cycle of preference: long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[28]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: a series of field experiments. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  C. Judd,et al.  Eye-movements and the Aesthetics of Visual Form. , 1903 .

[30]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  Josep Call,et al.  Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes , 2015, PloS one.

[32]  L. Isbell,et al.  Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[33]  A. Gomila,et al.  Is the human initial preference for rounded shapes universal? Preliminary results of an ongoing cross-cultural research , 2013 .

[34]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects , 2011, Perception.

[35]  H. Lundholm,et al.  The Affective Tone of Lines: Experimental Researches. , 1921 .

[36]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Curvature is a Basic Feature for Visual Search Tasks , 1992, Perception.

[37]  R. L. Fantz,et al.  Newborn infant attention to form of contour. , 1975, Child development.

[38]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  William Hogarth,et al.  Analysis of Beauty, Written with a View of Fixing the Fluctuating Ideas of Taste , 2017, Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics.

[41]  Vanessa Lobue Deconstructing the snake: the relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. , 2014, Emotion.

[42]  Influencia de la simetría y la curvilinealidad en el procesamiento de estímulos cerrados , 2002 .

[43]  J. Aronoff,et al.  How We Recognize Angry and Happy Emotion in People, Places, and Things , 2006 .