Predictive value of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of peritoneal and omental masses: results in 111 patients.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to determine the predictive value of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of peritoneal and omental masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of 111 patients who underwent biopsy of a peritoneal or omental mass from 1998 to 2006 was performed. Biopsy results were classified as diagnostic (malignant or benign) or nondiagnostic. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for all patients, and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was used to determine whether test characteristics varied by patient history (presence of a known cancer), mass size (<4 cm vs >or= 4 cm), and needle size (biopsies with fine needles vs biopsies with fine and large needles). RESULTS The overall diagnostic rate was 89% (99/111); there were 86 true-positive, one false-positive, six true-negative, and six false-negative results (sensitivity, 93% [86/92]; specificity, 86% [6/7]; NPV, 50% [6/12]). There were no statistically significant differences between patients with and without known cancer. Among 79 patients with known cancer, 52 (66%) had metastatic disease from the known cancer; in eight (10%) patients, the biopsy result yielded new primary cancers. Of 32 patients with no known cancer, 23 (72%) had malignant results. Biopsy test characteristics did not differ with respect to mass or needle size. Minor complications were seen in three (3%) patients. CONCLUSION Percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of peritoneal and omental masses is a safe, effective procedure that is useful in clinical practice. A second malignancy was revealed in a substantial number of patients with a known primary cancer. A new malignancy was diagnosed in most patients without a history of cancer.

[1]  G. Hall,et al.  Clinical utility of image-guided peritoneal and omental biopsy , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Stan B. Kaye,et al.  Imaging ovarian cancer and peritoneal metastases—current and emerging techniques , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  Greater and lesser omenta: normal anatomy and pathologic processes. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  B. Choi,et al.  Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the omentum and mesentery: CT findings and pathologic correlations. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M. Rioux,et al.  Sonographic detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a prospective study of 37 cases , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[6]  L. Layfield,et al.  Percutaneous image‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of peritoneal lesions , 2003, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[7]  C. Stewart,et al.  Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of radiologically detected abdominal lesions. , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  J. Spencer,et al.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis: image-guided peritoneal core biopsy for tumor type and patient care. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  D. Rubens,et al.  Extravisceral masses in the peritoneal cavity: sonographically guided biopsies in 52 patients. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Pitman,et al.  Aspiration cytology of malignant neoplasms associated with granulomas and granuloma‐like features , 1998, Cancer.

[11]  P. Abbitt,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for biopsy of omental abnormalities , 1992, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[12]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Computed tomography of omental pathology. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma: computed tomography, sonography, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R. Levitt,et al.  Detection of neoplastic involvement of the mesentery and omentum by computed tomography. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.