Patterns of transitional mutation biases within and among mammalian genomes.

Significant transition/transversion mutation bias is a well-appreciated aspect of mammalian nuclear genomes; however, patterns of bias among genes within a genome and among species remain largely uncharacterized. Understanding these patterns is important for understanding similarities and differences in mutational patterns among genomes and genomic regions. Therefore, we have conducted an analysis of 7,587 pairs of sequences of 4,347 mammalian protein-coding genes from seven species (human, mouse, rat, cow, sheep, pig, and macaque) and from the introns of 51 gene pairs and multiple intergenic regions (37 kbp, 52 kbp and 65 kbp) from the human, chimpanzee, and baboon genomes. Our analyses show that genes and regions with widely varying base composition exhibit uniformity of transition mutation rate both within and among mammalian lineages, as long as the transitional mutations caused by CpG hypermutability are excluded. The estimates show no relationship to potential intrachromosomal or interchromosomal effects. This uniformity points to similarity in point mutation processes in genomic regions with substantially different GC-content biases.

[1]  H. Kishino,et al.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  L. Hurst,et al.  Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  M. Nei,et al.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Wakeley,et al.  Substitution-rate variation among sites and the estimation of transition bias. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Sharp,et al.  Chromosomal location effects on gene sequence evolution in mammals , 1999, Current Biology.

[8]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software , 2001, Bioinform..

[9]  J. Bertranpetit,et al.  Profiles of accepted mutation: from neutrality in a pseudogene to disease-causing mutation on its homologous gene , 2001, Human Genetics.

[10]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[11]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[12]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .

[13]  M. D. Topal,et al.  Complementary base pairing and the origin of substitution mutations , 1976, Nature.

[14]  M. D. Topal,et al.  Base pairing and fidelity in codon–anticodon interaction , 1976, Nature.

[15]  Y. Ina Estimation of the Transition/Transversion Ratio , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  R. Sokal,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology , 1978 .

[17]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Estimation of the Transition/Transversion Rate Bias and Species Sampling , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[18]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F. Giannelli,et al.  Mutation rates in humans. II. Sporadic mutation-specific rates and rate of detrimental human mutations inferred from hemophilia B. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  M Krawczak,et al.  Neighboring-nucleotide effects on the rates of germ-line single-base-pair substitution in human genes. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  H. Akashi,et al.  Gene expression and molecular evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[22]  T. Jukes Transitions, transversions, and the molecular evolutionary clock , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[23]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  p53 mutations in human cancers. , 1991, Science.

[24]  M. Kimura A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  J. Wakeley,et al.  The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: new methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  M. Gouy,et al.  HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  P. Tolbert,et al.  Patterns of genetic alterations in pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis , 1999, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[28]  L. Hurst,et al.  The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates , 2000, Nature.

[29]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[30]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Rates of Conservative and Radical Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitutions in Mammalian Nuclear Genes , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  D. Pollock,et al.  A comparison of two methods for constructing evolutionary distances from a weighted contribution of transition and transversion differences. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  R. Grantham Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution , 1974, Science.

[33]  A. Bird DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.