Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.

PURPOSE To determine whether spiral CT angiography allows accurate, quantitative evaluation of anatomic abnormalities, including detection of additional lesions, delineation of plaque morphology, and estimation of degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. METHODS Spiral CT angiography with a maximum intensity projection technique was compared with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 92 carotid arteries. The category of stenosis was determined according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: mild (0% to 29%), moderate (30% to 69%), severe (70% to 99%), and occlusion (100%). RESULTS In 78 (85%) of the 92 cases, spiral CT angiography and selective DSA demonstrated the same degree of stenosis. All occlusions (n = 19) were diagnosed correctly with spiral CT angiography. Spiral CT angiography agreed with selective DSA in the classification of stenosis in 59% of the group with mild stenosis, in 82% of the group with moderate stenosis, and in 90% of the group with severe stenosis. In the groups with mild (n = 13), moderate (n = 9), and severe (n = 27) stenosis, correlation of spiral CT angiography with selective DSA was significant. Calcified plaques were readily diagnosed with the use of spiral CT angiography but delineation of ulcers was poor. Tandem lesions were not visible owing to the limited coverage. CONCLUSION Spiral CT angiography is useful for the detection of proximal internal carotid stenoses that are greater than 30%. Depiction of mild stenoses appears to be limited. CT is superior for the detection of calcified plaques but it is not useful for the detection of ulcers.

[1]  C R Bird,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  M. Cumming,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  R R Edelman,et al.  MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M S van Leeuwen,et al.  CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[5]  M. Castillo,et al.  Diagnosis of disease of the common carotid artery bifurcation: CT angiography vs catheter angiography. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  S Napel,et al.  Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Polak,et al.  Noninvasive carotid evaluation: carpe diem. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  J. Polak,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Work in progress. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Noninvasive carotid imaging: caveat emptor. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  S. Riederer,et al.  Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[12]  G D Rubin,et al.  CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. , 1992, Radiology.

[13]  R Kikinis,et al.  Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  G. Sicard MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis: European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235-43 , 1992 .

[15]  P. J. Keller,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[16]  T J Masaryk,et al.  3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination. , 1991, Radiology.

[17]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[18]  M. Modic,et al.  Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: longterm prognosis. , 1982, Stroke.

[19]  V. Servois,et al.  Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. , 1994, Radiology.

[20]  J R Waugh,et al.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. , 1992, Radiology.

[21]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography. , 1992, Radiology.