Variability in response criteria affects estimates of conscious identification and unconscious semantic priming

Three experiments examined the role of response criteria in a masked semantic priming paradigm using an exclusion task. Experiment 1 used on-line prime-report ("report the prime if you saw it") and exclusion instructions in which participants were told to avoid completing a word stem (e.g. mo-) with a word related to a prime (e.g. cash) flashed for 0, 38 or 212ms. Semantic priming (i.e. exclusion failure) was significant in the items analysis, but was moderated by peoples' ability to report the prime in the participant analysis. Prime-report thresholds in Experiment 2 were made more liberal by instructing participants to guess on every trial. Prime-report increased from Experiment 1 as exclusion failures were eliminated. Experiment 3 clarified the relationship between awareness and prime identification using an on-line measure of confidence and different liberal prime report instructions. The current findings suggest that the ability to act upon (via exclusion performance) and report information in a masked prime is determined by a variable response criterion, which can be manipulated as an independent variable.

[1]  D. Holender,et al.  Unconscious perception: The need for a paradigm shift , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  V. J. Dark,et al.  Semantic Priming and Identification of near Threshold Primes in a Lexical Decision Task , 1991 .

[3]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Perception without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical and Social Perspectives , 1993 .

[4]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior , 1978 .

[5]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[6]  Troy A. W. Visser,et al.  Conscious and Unconscious Processes: The Effects of Motivation , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  P. Merikle,et al.  Unconscious perception revisited , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  S C Draine,et al.  Replicable unconscious semantic priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  E. Bisiach.  Through the looking-glass and what cognitive psychology found there , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  Scientific Approaches to Consciousness , 1997 .

[12]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  S. Haase,et al.  Exclusion failure does not demonstrate unconscious perception II: Evidence from a forced-choice exclusion task , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  J. R. Doyle.  Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening , parafoveal vision , and visual masking : A survey and appraisal , 2008 .

[15]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[16]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  Treating consciousness as a variable: the fading taboo , 2003 .

[17]  E. Reingold,et al.  Theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes , 1990 .

[18]  P. Merikle,et al.  Priming with and without awareness , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S. Haase,et al.  Confidence in word detection predicts word identification: implications for an unconscious perception paradigm. , 2001, American Journal of Psychology.

[20]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[21]  M. Daneman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTION , 1998 .

[22]  M. Snodgrass.  Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception? , 2002, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  C. Deeprose,et al.  Is priming during anesthesia unconscious? , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  M. Erdelyi,et al.  Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Measuring the Relative Magnitude of Unconscious Influences , 1995, Consciousness and Cognition.

[26]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness , 2001 .

[27]  Peter B. Walker,et al.  Is unconscious identity priming lexical or sublexical? , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  N. Block.  Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness , 2001, Cognition.

[29]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays , 1993 .

[30]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  H. Pashler,et al.  Confidence and Accuracy of Near-Threshold Discrimination Responses , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  J. Kihlstrom.  The Continuum of Consciousness , 1993, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Parts Outweigh the Whole (Word) in Unconscious Analysis of Meaning , 2000, Psychological science.

[35]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious perception: attention, awareness, and control. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  J. Schooler,et al.  Consciousness and the limits of language: You can't always say what you think or think what you say. , 1997 .

[38]  A. Greenwald.  New look 3. Unconscious cognition reclaimed. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[39]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  The psychophysics of subliminal perception , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  Conscious identification: Where do you draw the line? , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Unconscious semantic categorization and mask interactions: An elaborate response to Kunde et al. (2005) , 2005, Cognition.