Screening for familial ovarian cancer: poor survival of BRCA1/2 related cancers

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of annual ovarian cancer screening (transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 estimation) in reducing mortality from ovarian cancer in women at increased genetic risk. Patients and methods: A cohort of 3532 women at increased risk of ovarian cancer was screened at five European centres between January 1991 and March 2007. Survival from diagnosis of ovarian cancer was calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared for proven BRCA1/2 carriers with non-carriers and whether the cancer was detected at prevalence or post-prevalent scan. Screening was performed by annual transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 measurement. Results: 64 epithelial ovarian malignancies (59 invasive and 5 borderline), developed in the cohort. 26 tumours were detected at prevalent round; there were 27 incident detected cancers and 11 interval. 65% of cancers were stage 3 or 4, however, stage and survival were little different for prevalent versus post-prevalent cancers. Five year and 10 year survival in 49 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 58.6% (95% CI 50.9% to 66.3%) and 36% (95% CI 27% to 45%), which was significantly worse than for 15 non-BRCA carriers (91.8%, 95% CI 84% to 99.6%, both 5 and 10 year survival p = 0.015). However, when borderline tumours were excluded, the difference in survival between carriers and non-carriers was no longer significant. Conclusion: Annual surveillance, by transvaginal ultrasound scanning and serum CA125 measurement, in women at increased familial risk of ovarian cancer is ineffective in detecting tumours at a sufficiently early stage to influence substantially survival in BRCA1/2 carriers.

[1]  T. Terao,et al.  Serum CA125 level before the development of ovarian cancer , 2007, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  H. V. van Boven,et al.  No efficacy of annual gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; an observational follow-up study , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  G. Fleuren,et al.  Prediction of BRCA1/2 mutation status in patients with ovarian cancer from a hospital-based cohort , 2007, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  R. Tollenaar,et al.  Efficacy of screening women at high risk of hereditary ovarian cancer: results of an 11‐year cohort study , 2006, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[5]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in families with BRCA mutations. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[6]  S. M. Huson Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Genetics, Screening and Management , 2004 .

[7]  M. Friedlander,et al.  Biology of epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for screening women at high genetic risk. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Histopathology, FIGO Stage, and BRCA Mutation Status of Ovarian Cancers from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry , 2004, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[9]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Improved survival in women with BRCA‐associated ovarian carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[10]  A. Tailor,et al.  Results from an ultrasound‐based familial ovarian cancer screening clinic: a 10‐year observational study , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  Douglas F Easton,et al.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  Susan L Neuhausen,et al.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Cancer incidence in a population of Jewish women at risk of ovarian cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Murphy,et al.  Use of CA-125 and ultrasound in high-risk women , 2001, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[15]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Cancer screening in a high risk population: a clinical trial. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  B. Rosen,et al.  Prevalence and penetrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population series of 649 women with ovarian cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  K. Heimdal,et al.  Prospectively detected cancer in familial breast/ovarian cancer screening , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[18]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA‐mismatch‐repair genes , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[19]  D. Easton,et al.  A systematic review and meta‐analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  J. Carter An Update On Ovarian Cancer Screening , 1994, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[22]  P. Chappuis,et al.  Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Overview of the clinical genetics of ovarian cancer , 2002 .

[23]  T. Sheldon,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer: a systematic review. , 1998, Health technology assessment.