The role of innovative global institutions in linking knowledge and action

It is becoming increasingly recognized that our collective ability to tackle complex problems will require the development of new, adaptive, and innovative institutional arrangements that can deal with rapidly changing knowledge and have effective learning capabilities. In this paper, we applied a knowledge-systems perspective to examine how institutional innovations can affect the generation, sharing, and application of scientific and technical knowledge. We report on a case study that examined the effects that one large innovative organization, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, is having on the knowledge dimensions of decision-making in global health. The case study shows that the organization created demand for new knowledge from a range of actors, but it did not incorporate strategies for meeting this demand into their own rules, incentives, or procedures. This made it difficult for some applicants to meet the organization's dual aims of scientific soundness and national ownership of projects. It also highlighted that scientific knowledge needed to be integrated with managerial and situational knowledge for success. More generally, the study illustrates that institutional change targeting implementation can also significantly affect the dynamics of knowledge creation (learning), access, distribution, and use. Recognizing how action-oriented institutions can affect these dynamics across their knowledge system can help institutional designers build more efficient and effective institutions for sustainable development.

[1]  P. Poore The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). , 2004, Health policy and planning.

[2]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[3]  J. Sachs,et al.  Defining and refining international donor support for combating the AIDS pandemic , 2001, The Lancet.

[4]  M. Galinski,et al.  WHO, the Global Fund, and medical malpractice in malaria treatment , 2004, The Lancet.

[5]  P. Matson,et al.  Linking Knowledge with Action for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Change and Effectiveness , 2012 .

[6]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[7]  Lorrae van Kerkhoff,et al.  Linking local knowledge with global action: examining the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria through a knowledge system lens. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[8]  Jon Cohen,et al.  The New World of Global Health , 2006, Science.

[9]  A. Birn Gates's grandest challenge: transcending technology as public health ideology , 2005, The Lancet.

[10]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[11]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective , 2008 .

[12]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Feedbacks of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Change , 2007 .

[14]  V. Preedy,et al.  Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria , 2010 .

[15]  P. Plsek,et al.  Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Jon Cohen,et al.  Global health. The new world of global health. , 2006, Science.

[17]  A. Haines,et al.  Policy and Practice Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health , 2004 .

[18]  Carla AbouZahr,et al.  From data to policy: good practices and cautionary tales , 2007, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Feachem Editorial: The Research Imperative: Fighting AIDS, TB and Malaria , 2004, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[20]  M. Edwards Future Positive: International Co-Operation in the 21st Century , 2001 .