Continuous product innovation: A comparison of key elements across different contingency sets

This paper discusses results from an international study of continuous improvement in product innovation. The empirical research is based upon a theoretical model of continuous product innovation (CPI) that identifies contingencies, behaviours, levers and performances relevant to improving product innovation processes. As successful knowledge management is widely recognised as a key capability for firms to successfully develop CPI, companies have been classified according to identified contingencies and the impact of these contingencies on key knowledge management criteria. Comparative analysis of the identified groups of companies has demonstrated important differences between the learning behaviours found present in the two groups thus identified, and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviours. The selection of performance measures by the two groups has highlighted further significant differences in the way the two groups understand and measure their CPI processes. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar contingency sets to improve their approaches to organisational learning and product innovation.

[1]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[2]  Raynold A. Svenson,et al.  Measuring R&D Productivity , 1988 .

[3]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[4]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Continuous Product Innovation , 1998 .

[5]  Warren B. Brown,et al.  Observations on the measurement of R&D productivity: a case study , 1992 .

[6]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[7]  Philip A. Roussel,et al.  Third generation R & D : managing the link to corporate strategy / Philip A. Roussel, Kamal N. Saad, Tamara J. Erickson , 1991 .

[8]  John Bessant,et al.  Rediscovering continuous improvement , 1994 .

[9]  C. V. Bonsdorff,et al.  Supporting the Business Process Management Paradigm by Means of Performance Measurements , 1995 .

[10]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[11]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development , 1997 .

[12]  Eric Flamholtz,et al.  Effective organizational control: A framework, applications, and implications , 1996 .

[13]  D. Otley,et al.  Accounting for Management Control , 1990 .

[14]  William E. Souder,et al.  Measuring R&D Performance-State of the Art , 1997 .

[15]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .