Influence of Duty-Cycled Wake-Up Receiver Characteristics on Energy Consumption in Single-Hop Networks

In sensor network applications with low traffic intensity, idle channel listening is one of the main sources of energy waste. The use of a dedicated low-power wake-up receiver (WRx), which utilizes duty-cycled channel listening, can significantly reduce the idle listening energy cost. Extreme low-power design typically leads to performance losses, indirectly increasing energy costs. Striking the right balance is, therefore, very important when introducing WRxs. We present a system analysis and heuristic parameter optimization for an existing duty-cycled WRx medium access control scheme. First, we introduce a framework for analysis of energy consumption and delay of an entire single-hop network where we include WRx characteristics. The WRx characteristics are condensed into two parameters: reduction in power consumption and associated loss of performance, compared with the main receiver. The analysis framework is used to find optimal wake-up beacon and protocol parameters for different WRx characteristics to minimize the total network energy consumption per data packet. The importance of the optimization is that it provides information on if, and how much, we can save in terms of energy by introducing a WRx with a certain characteristic. We also present accurate approximations of both optimal energy savings and resulting delays.

[1]  Ove Edfors,et al.  DCW-MAC: An Energy Efficient Medium Access Scheme Using Duty-Cycled Low-Power Wake-Up Receivers , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[2]  Omer Gurewitz,et al.  RI-MAC: a receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks , 2008, SenSys '08.

[3]  En-Yi Lin A Comprehensive Study of Power-Efficient Rendezvous Schemes for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[4]  Xiaoyan Wang,et al.  A 2.4GHz/915MHz 51µW wake-up receiver with offset and noise suppression , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC).

[5]  Kofi A. A. Makinwa,et al.  A 2.4GHz 830pJ/bit duty-cycled wake-up receiver with −82dBm sensitivity for crystal-less wireless sensor nodes , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC).

[6]  Eric Anderson,et al.  X-MAC: a short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks , 2006, SenSys '06.

[7]  Thomas Herndl,et al.  A 2.4µW Wake-up Receiver for wireless sensor nodes with −71dBm sensitivity , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[8]  John B. Anderson,et al.  Ultra low power transceivers for wireless sensors and body area networks , 2014, 2014 8th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT).

[9]  Henrik Sjöland,et al.  A 2.45GHz, 50uW wake-up receiver front-end with −88dBm sensitivity and 250kbps data rate , 2014, ESSCIRC 2014 - 40th European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC).

[10]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[11]  Ove Edfors,et al.  A Receiver Architecture for Devices in Wireless Body Area Networks , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[12]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  pTunes: runtime parameter adaptation for low-power MAC protocols , 2012, IPSN.

[13]  P. Park,et al.  Analysis and optimization of duty-cycle in preamble-based random access networks , 2013, Wirel. Networks.

[14]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Power-efficient rendez-vous schemes for dense wireless sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[15]  S Shashidharan,et al.  A CMOS Low-Power Transceiver With Reconfigurable Antenna Interface for Medical Implant Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[16]  Ove Edfors,et al.  Performance Analysis and Energy Optimization of Wake-Up Receiver Schemes for Wireless Low-Power Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[17]  M. Lakshmanan,et al.  AN ADAPTIVE ENERGY EFFICIENT MAC PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS , 2009 .

[18]  Stefan Mahlknecht,et al.  An Ultra Low Power Wakeup Receiver for Wireless Sensor Nodes , 2009, 2009 Third International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

[19]  Amre El-Hoiydi,et al.  WiseMAC: An Ultra Low Power MAC Protocol for Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004, ALGOSENSORS.

[20]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Low power distributed MAC for ad hoc sensor radio networks , 2001, GLOBECOM'01. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Cat. No.01CH37270).

[21]  Yan Zhang,et al.  An analytical model for energy efficiency analysis of different wakeup radio schemes , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[22]  O. Edfors,et al.  Sub-VT design of a wake-up receiver back-end in 65 nm CMOS , 2012, 2012 IEEE Subthreshold Microelectronics Conference (SubVT).

[23]  Amre El-Hoiydi,et al.  Aloha with preamble sampling for sporadic traffic in ad hoc wireless sensor networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[24]  S. Gambini,et al.  A 52 $\mu$ W Wake-Up Receiver With $-$ 72 dBm Sensitivity Using an Uncertain-IF Architecture , 2009, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[25]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Ultra-low duty cycle MAC with scheduled channel polling , 2006, SenSys '06.

[26]  S. Mahlknecht,et al.  CSMA-MPS: a minimum preamble sampling MAC protocol for low power wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 2004. Proceedings..

[27]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[28]  Guido Dolmans,et al.  Analytical Models for the Wake-Up Receiver Power Budget for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[29]  Xin Liu,et al.  A 2.4/5.8 GHz 10 μW wake-up receiver with −65/−50 dBm sensitivity using direct active rf detection , 2012, 2012 IEEE Asian Solid State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC).

[30]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  A 65 μW, 1.9 GHz RF to digital baseband wakeup receiver for wireless sensor nodes , 2007, 2007 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference.