Comparison Between the Original and Shortened Versions of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in Ischemic Stroke Patients of Intermediate Severity

Background and Purpose— The 15-item National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) has been critiqued for its complexity and variability, and shortened versions have been proposed. This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of the original version with 3 shortened versions with 11, 8, and 5 items, respectively. Methods— Analyses were performed using data from an international, double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of MLC601 on stroke recovery in patients with ischemic stroke of intermediate severity (Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke recovery [CHIMES]). To compare discriminative ability and responsiveness to change, the effect sizes of the NIHSS scores in relation to modified Rankin Scale, mini-mental status examination, and Barthel index were estimated using regression analysis. Results— For both discriminative ability and responsiveness to change, the original version exhibited a larger effect size (0.55 and 0.84) in relation to modified Rankin Scale than the other 3 shortened versions (0.35–0.46 and 0.74–0.78). Conclusions— The original 15-item NIHSS retained information that made it more discriminative and responsive to change than the shortened versions. We recommend future clinical researchers to use the full version NIHSS to evaluate patients’ stroke severity. Clinical Trial Registration Information— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00554723.

[1]  Sombat Muengtaweepongsa,et al.  Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke Recovery: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study , 2013, Stroke.

[2]  N. Venketasubramanian,et al.  A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Investigate Chinese Medicine Neuroaid Efficacy on Stroke Recovery (CHIMES Study) , 2009, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[3]  W. Longstreth,et al.  Shortening the NIH Stroke Scale for Use in the Prehospital Setting , 2002, Stroke.

[4]  Brett C Meyer,et al.  Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for Use in Stroke Clinical Trials: Prospective Reliability and Validity , 2002, Stroke.

[5]  P D Lyden,et al.  A Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for Use in Stroke Clinical Trials: Preliminary Reliability and Validity , 2001, Stroke.

[6]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2000 .

[7]  J. Marler,et al.  Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. , 1999, Stroke.

[8]  J. McNeil,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Rating by Neurologistsand N urses in a Community-Based Stroke Incidence Study , 1999, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[9]  J. Rudolf,et al.  Training as a prerequisite for reliable use of NIH Stroke Scale. , 1998, Stroke.

[10]  A J Morales,et al.  Quality of Life Assessment , 1996, Seminars in reproductive endocrinology.

[11]  H. Adams,et al.  Ensuring Reliability of Outcome Measures in Multicenter Clinical Trials of Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Program Developed for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) , 1994, Stroke.

[12]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[13]  James N. Davis,et al.  Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[14]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .