Current-and Varifold-Based Registration of Lung Vessel and Airway Trees

Registering lung CT images is an important problem for many applications including tracking lung motion over the breathing cycle, tracking anatomical and function changes over time, and detecting abnormal mechanical properties of the lung. This paper compares and contrasts current-and varifold-based diffeomorphic image registration approaches for registering tree-like structures of the lung. In these approaches, curve-like structures in the lung—for example, the skeletons of vessels and airways segmentation—are represented by currents or varifolds in the dual space of a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). Current and varifold representations are discretized and are parameterized via of a collection of momenta. A momenta corresponds to a line segment via the coordinates of the center of the line segment and the tangent direction of the line segment at the center. A varifold-based registration approach is similar to currents except that two varifold representations are aligned independent of the tangent vector orientation. An advantage of varifolds over currents is that the orientation of the tangent vectors can be difficult to determine especially when the vessel and airway trees are not connected. In this paper, we examine the image registration sensitivity and accuracy of current-and varifold-based registration as a function of the number and location of momentum used to represent tree like-structures in the lung. The registrations presented in this paper were generated using the Deformetrica software package ([Durrleman et al. 2014]).

[1]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Sparse Approximation of Currents for Statistics on Curves and Surfaces , 2008, MICCAI.

[2]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  The Varifold Representation of Nonoriented Shapes for Diffeomorphic Registration , 2013, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[3]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Inferring brain variability from diffeomorphic deformations of currents: An integrative approach , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Geodesic Shooting for Computational Anatomy , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[5]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Beyond Frangi: an improved multiscale vesselness filter , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Stanley Durrleman,et al.  Statistical models of currents for measuring the variability of anatomical curves, surfaces and their evolution. (Modèles statistiques de courants pour mesurer la variabilité anatomique de courbes, de surfaces et de leur évolution) , 2010 .

[7]  Stanley Durrleman,et al.  Curve- and surface-based registration of lung CT images via currents , 2009 .

[8]  Joan Alexis Glaunès,et al.  Surface Matching via Currents , 2005, IPMI.

[9]  Stephen Marsland,et al.  Discrete Mechanics and Optimal Control for Image Registration , 2007 .

[10]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  Geoffrey D Hugo,et al.  Tumor, lymph node, and lymph node-to-tumor displacements over a radiotherapy series: analysis of interfraction and intrafraction variations using active breathing control (ABC) in lung cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy for lung cancer. , 2010, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[13]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Potential of adaptive radiotherapy to escalate the radiation dose in combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Unifying Vascular Information in Intensity-Based Nonrigid Lung CT Registration , 2010, WBIR.

[15]  Michael Schwenk,et al.  Tumor , 1828, The London medical and physical journal.

[16]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..