Spatial analysis and hazard assessment on soil total nitrogen in the middle subtropical zone of China

Nitrogen (N) is one of the main factors affecting environmental pollution. In recent years, non-point source pollution and water body eutrophication have become increasing concerns for both scientists and the policy-makers. In order to assess the environmental hazard of soil total N pollution, a typical ecological unit was selected as the experimental site. This paper showed that Box-Cox transformation achieved normality in the data set, and dampened the effect of outliers. The best theoretical model of soil total N was a Gaussian model. Spatial variability of soil total N at NE60° and NE150° directions showed that it had a strip anisotropic structure. The ordinary kriging estimate of soil total N concentration was mapped. The spatial distribution pattern of soil total N in the direction of NE150° displayed a strip-shaped structure. Kriging standard deviations (KSD) provided valuable information that will increase the accuracy of total N mapping. The probability kriging method is useful to assess the hazard of N pollution by providing the conditional probability of N concentration exceeding the threshold value, where we found soil total N>2.0g/kg. The probability distribution of soil total N will be helpful to conduct hazard assessment, optimal fertilization, and develop management practices to control the non-point sources of N pollution.

[1]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[2]  P. A. Burrough,et al.  Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I: The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation , 1983 .

[3]  Lu RuKun,et al.  Nutrient balance of agroecosystem in six provinces in Southern China. , 2000 .

[4]  A. Konopka,et al.  FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS , 1994 .

[5]  Yu-Pin Lin,et al.  Factorial and indicator kriging methods using a geographic information system to delineate spatial variation and pollution sources of soil heavy metals , 2002 .

[6]  C. Deutsch,et al.  Teacher's Aide Variogram Interpretation and Modeling , 2001 .

[7]  J. Baerdemaeker,et al.  The spatial variability of some aspects of topsoil fertility in two Belgian fields , 1996 .

[8]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[9]  A. Warrick,et al.  Estimating Soil Water Content Using Cokriging1 , 1987 .

[10]  A. Glass Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Crop Plants: Physiological Constraints upon Nitrogen Absorption , 2003 .

[11]  Chaosheng Zhang,et al.  Geostatistical analyses and hazard assessment on soil lead in Silvermines area, Ireland. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Horng-Yuh Guo,et al.  Geostatistical Analysis of Soil Properties of Mid-West Taiwan Soils , 1997 .

[13]  T. Kosaki,et al.  Spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions and their soil-related determining factors in an agricultural field. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[14]  R. Webster,et al.  Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. II. Block kriging. , 1980 .

[15]  A. Castrignanò,et al.  ESTIMATING SOIL WATER CONTENT USING COKRIGING , 1990 .