Low-Overhead Handover-Skipping Technique for 5G Networks

Network densification has been one of the principal causes of performance gain in cellular networks, and 5G networks will not be any different. As cell sizes shrink, handovers become more frequent incurring extra delays that bury all the prospective gains. Mobility in multi-tier dense cellular networks calls for a change in the way it has been traditionally handled in an always-on world, where users take universal data access for granted. Invisible to them, mobile network operators need to provision backhauling to include advanced interference mitigation techniques. In this paper, we propose a spectrum database-aided handover management technique that aims to mitigate the number of disconnections without overloading the backhaul unnecessarily. The proposed technique exploits a spectrum database that stores reception information along with geolocation data, commercially available on any handheld device. Moreover, we have benchmarked several state-of-the-art handover schemes for 5G networks against ours in a realistic urban environment with user mobility trace data. The results highlight that our method can deliver the same downstream traffic with 33% decrease in disconnections when compared to the conventional approach. At the same time, backhaul traffic is reduced up to 68% against our counterparts.

[1]  Ben Liang,et al.  Stochastic Geometric Analysis of User Mobility in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  S. Jaeckel,et al.  Estimating the mobile backhaul traffic in distributed coordinated multi-point systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[3]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Handover Management in 5G and Beyond: A Topology Aware Skipping Approach , 2016, IEEE Access.

[4]  Beeshanga Abewardana Jayawickrama,et al.  REM-based handover algorithm for next-generation multi-tier cellular networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[5]  A. Lozano,et al.  What Will 5 G Be ? , 2014 .

[6]  Siegfried Reich,et al.  Why GPS makes distances bigger than they are , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Sherif Sakr,et al.  Performance Evaluation Framework of Cloud Platforms , 2014 .

[8]  Constantinos Psomas,et al.  Mobility Management in Ultra-Dense Networks: Handover Skipping Techniques , 2018, IEEE Access.

[9]  Yoann Corre,et al.  Three-Dimensional Urban EM Wave Propagation Model for Radio Network Planning and Optimization Over Large Areas , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Velocity-Aware Handover Management in Two-Tier Cellular Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility , 2012 .

[12]  Holger Claussen,et al.  Towards 1 Gbps/UE in Cellular Systems: Understanding Ultra-Dense Small Cell Deployments , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Successive Interference Cancellation in Heterogeneous Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Lars Thiele,et al.  Coordinated multipoint: Concepts, performance, and field trial results , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  David A. Hensher Performance Evaluation Frameworks , 2005 .

[16]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[17]  Xiaoli Chu,et al.  Mobility management challenges in 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Jordi Pérez-Romero,et al.  On the use of radio environment maps for interference management in heterogeneous networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.