Automatic identification of coronary tree anatomy in coronary computed tomography angiography

An automatic coronary artery tree labeling algorithm is described to identify the anatomical segments of the extracted centerlines from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images. This method will facilitate the automatic lesion reporting and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Three-dimensional (3D) models for both right dominant (RD) and left dominant (LD) coronary circulations were built. All labels in the model were matched with their possible candidates in the extracted tree to find the optimal labeling result. In total, 83 CCTA datasets with 1149 segments were included in the testing of the algorithm. The results of the automatic labeling were compared with those by two experts. In all cases, the proximal parts of main branches including LM were labeled correctly. The automatic labeling algorithm was able to identify and assign labels to 89.2% RD and 83.6% LD coronary tree segments in comparison with the agreements of the two experts (97.6% RD, 87.6% LD). The average precision of start and end points of segments was 92.0% for RD and 90.7% for LD in comparison with the manual identification by two experts while average differences in experts is 1.0% in RD and 2.2% in LD cases. All cases got similar clinical risk scores as the two experts. The presented fully automatic labeling algorithm can identify and assign labels to the extracted coronary centerlines for both RD and LD circulations.

[1]  V. Fuster Hurst's the Heart , 1966 .

[2]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[3]  E. Bolson,et al.  Intrathoracic spatial location of specified coronary segments on the normal human heart. Applications in quantitative arteriography, assessment of regional risk and contraction, and anatomic display. , 1988, Circulation.

[4]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Modeling the 3D coronary tree for labeling purposes , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of the association of proximal coronary culprit artery lesion location with clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  L. Gregorini,et al.  Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis : Severity of the Disease , Severity of Angina Pectoris and Compromised Left Ventricular Function , 2005 .

[8]  K. Harjai,et al.  Does proximal location of culprit lesion confer worse prognosis in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction? , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[9]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[11]  Martin Styner,et al.  Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Sean Murphy,et al.  Automatic labelling of coronary arteries , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.

[13]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  R. Morin,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Morin,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Automatic centerline extraction of coronary arteries in coronary computed tomographic angiography , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: Comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  E. Rosenthal,et al.  LEFT-DOMINANT CORONARY ARTERY CIRCULATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: DATA FROM THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY NATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR DATA REGISTRY FOR CATHETERIZATION PERCUTANEOUS CORON , 2011 .

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CORONARY VESSEL DOMINANCE AS DETERMINED USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY , 2011 .

[20]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Automatic coronary artery tree labeling in coronary computed tomographic angiography datasets , 2011, 2011 Computing in Cardiology.

[21]  Clerio F de Azevedo,et al.  Prognostic value of CT angiography in patients with inconclusive functional stress tests. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  L. V. Vliet,et al.  Automatic segmentation, detection and quantification of coronary artery stenoses on CTA , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[23]  K. Chinnaiyan,et al.  SCCT guidelines on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Feasibility of an automated quantitative computed tomography angiography-derived risk score for risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  Yefeng Zheng,et al.  CTA Coronary Labeling through Efficient Geodesics between Trees Using Anatomy Priors , 2014, MICCAI.

[26]  S. Raposeiras-Roubín,et al.  Coronary Artery Dominance and Long-term Prognosis in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Angioplasty. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[27]  Huazhong Shu,et al.  Curve-Like Structure Extraction Using Minimal Path Propagation With Backtracking , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  F. Rybicki,et al.  CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Car , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[29]  Aimin Hao,et al.  Robust Optimization-Based Coronary Artery Labeling From X-Ray Angiograms , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[30]  Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín,et al.  Dominancia coronaria y pronóstico a largo plazo de los pacientes con infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST tratado con angioplastia primaria , 2016 .