Rod contributions to the electroretinogram of the dark‐adapted developing zebrafish

Anatomical studies of the developing zebrafish retina have shown that rods approach maturity at about 15 days postfertilization (dpf). Past work has examined the photopic spectral sensitivity function of the developing zebrafish, but not spectral sensitivity under dark‐adapted conditions. This study examined rod contributions to the dark‐adapted spectral sensitivity function of the ERG b‐wave component in developing zebrafish. ERG responses to stimuli of various wavelengths and irradiances were obtained from dark‐adapted fish at 6–8, 13–15, 21–24, and 27–29 dpf. The results show that dark‐adapted spectral sensitivity varied with age. Spectral sensitivity functions of the 6–8 and 13–15 dpf groups appeared to be cone dominated and contained little or no rod contributions. Spectral sensitivity functions of the 21–24 and 27–29 dpf groups appeared to have both rod and cone contributions. Even at the oldest age group tested, the dark‐adapted spectral sensitivity function did not match the adult function. Thus, consistent with anatomical findings, the rod contributions to the ERG spectral sensitivity function appear to develop with age; however, these contributions are still not adult‐like by 29 dpf, which is contrary to anatomical work. These results illustrate that the zebrafish is an excellent model for visual development. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Saszik,et al.  ERG assessment of zebrafish retinal development , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Saszik,et al.  The effects of temperature on the dark-adapted spectral sensitivity function of the adult zebrafish , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  Joseph Bilotta,et al.  Establishing and maintaining a low-cost zebrafish breeding and behavioral research facility , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  W. Patterson,et al.  Cone contributions to the photopic spectral sensitivity of the zebrafish ERG , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  G. D. Bernard,et al.  Sensitivity of cones from a cyprinid fish (Danio aequipinnatus) to ultraviolet and visible light , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Raymond,et al.  Developmental patterning of rod and cone photoreceptors in embryonic zebrafish , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  G. Quinn,et al.  Development of electroretinogram and rod phototransduction response in human infants. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  J. Dowling,et al.  Zebrafish ultraviolet visual pigment: absorption spectrum, sequence, and localization. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Bremiller,et al.  Early onset of phenotype and cell patterning in the embryonic zebrafish retina. , 1990, Development.

[10]  T. Branchek,et al.  The development of photoreceptors in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. I. Structure , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  T. Branchek The development of photoreceptors in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. II. Function , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  Dt. Clark Visual responses in developing zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) , 1982 .

[13]  Daniel G. Green,et al.  Double branched flicker fusion curves from the all-rod skate retina. , 1975, Science.

[14]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Red-Green Cone Interactions in the Increment-Threshold Spectral Sensitivity of Primates , 1971, Science.

[15]  H. Dartnall,et al.  The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. , 1953, British medical bulletin.