Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides. Mental health, stress and risk perception: insights from psychological research.

Risk perceptions are only slightly correlated with the expected values of a probability distribution for negative health impacts. Psychometric studies have documented that context variables such as dread or personal control are important predictors for the perceived seriousness of risk. Studies about cultural patterns of risk perceptions emphasize different response sets to risk information, depending on cultural priorities such as social justice versus personal freedom. This chapter reports the major psychological research results pertaining to the factors that govern individual risk perception and discusses the psychometric effects due to people's risk perception and the experience of severe stress. The relative importance of the psychometric context variables, the signals pertaining to each health risks and symbolic beliefs are explained.

[1]  M. Hüppe,et al.  Empirische Befunde zur Wirkung von Umweltkatastrophen auf das Erleben und die Streßverarbeitung von Männern und Frauen unterschiedlichen Alters , 1993 .

[2]  F. Tretter,et al.  Umweltbelastungen und Ängste , 1993 .

[3]  William J. Burns,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications , 1992 .

[4]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[5]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Desired Risk: Broadening the Social Amplification of Risk Framework1 , 1990 .

[6]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Technology, environment and social risk: a systems perspective , 1990 .

[7]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[8]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[9]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1987 .

[10]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  An axiomatic theory of conjoint expected risk , 1986 .

[11]  T R Lee,et al.  Effective communication of information about chemical hazards. , 1986, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Ortwin Renn.  Akzeptanzforschung : Technik in der gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung , 1986 .

[13]  J. Short.  The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  V. Covello.  The perception of technological risks: A literature review , 1983 .

[15]  A. Baum,et al.  Emotional, behavioral, and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  Lola L. Lopes.  Some thoughts on the psychological concept of risk. , 1983 .

[17]  H. Otway,et al.  Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy1,2 , 1982 .

[18]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large , 1981 .

[19]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[21]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death , 1979 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[23]  H. J. Otway,et al.  A Comparative Study of Public Beliefs about Five Energy Systems , 1979 .

[24]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[25]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  A theory of risk , 1970 .

[26]  Richard Hofstadter.  Social Darwinism in American Thought, 1860-1915 , 1944 .