The Transfer of Resources and Competencies for Developing Technological Capabilities - The Case of Fujitsu-ICL

In the management literature and the literature on technology transfer, it is widely acknowledged that learning in general, and the leveraging of knowledge throughout firms in particular, is important. However, there appears little systematic evidence of what technology and knowledge is transferred between organizations and how this occurs. The literature also tends to neglect how firms use such technology/knowledge transfer to cultivate appropriate technological capabilities. This paper addresses this gap in the literature by examining the successful exchange of resources and competencies between Fujitsu and ICL, and how it helped to extend the technological capabilities of both firms. It traces the evolution of the relationship from that of a loose technology-sharing agreement to that of sustained project collaboration and partnership. This relationship proved to be enduring, and provides a road map for firms engaged in technology/knowledge transfer to develop their indigenous technological capabilities.

[1]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[2]  Martin Campbell-Kelly,et al.  ICL: A Business and Technical History , 1989 .

[3]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[5]  E. Bryan Carne,et al.  A study of the factors which affect technology transfer in a multilocation multibusiness unit corporation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units: A Comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain , 1980 .

[7]  M. Aoki.  Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy: A Microtheory of the Japanese Economy , 1988 .

[8]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[9]  Eric Rebentisch,et al.  A study of technology transfer in a multinational cooperative joint venture , 1996 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[13]  John McGee,et al.  Technology and strategic management progress and future directions , 1989 .

[14]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[15]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Eastern Asian Enterprise Structures and the Comparative Analysis of Forms of Business Organization , 1990 .

[16]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  Strategic Fit and the Societal Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources , 1991 .

[17]  G. Hamel,et al.  Competence-based competition , 1994 .

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[20]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[21]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[22]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Linking international technology transfer with strategy and management: a literature commentary , 1994 .

[23]  F. Kodama.  Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .