Improvement of hypertension management by structured physician education and feedback system: cluster randomized trial

Introduction We aimed to assess whether hypertension management with a structured physician information program and a feedback system leads to improved blood pressure (BP) control and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods Cluster randomized (3: 1), open, monitored, multicenter trial in Germany. Primary care-based physicians in the information group (IG) received detailed training on hypertension guidelines, feedback on target-level attainment, and a reminder to intensify treatment after each patient visit, whereas the observation/control group (CG) did not receive any such measures. A three-level mixed model was developed. Time-independent level differences between groups, group-independent changes, and nonparallel group-specific changes over time were tested. Results A total of 15 041 (78.1%) hypertensive patients were in the IG and 4213 (21.9%) in the CG. By 1-year follow-up, 82.9% of patients in the IG and 81.5% in the CG remained in the study. The guideline-oriented BP target was attained by 56.8% in the IG and 52.5% in the CG (+ 4.3%, P = 0.03), whereas the individual BP target was attained by 57.0% in the IG and 51% in the CG (P = NS). BP control in the IG was achieved 2 months earlier on average. Clinical inertia, defined as the absence of medication changes, despite noncontrol of BP, occurred significantly less often in the IG group. One-year cardiovascular outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusion The delivery of systematic information in connection with a feedback system reduces clinical inertia and improves guideline adherence. Although compared with earlier studies, the hypertension control rates obtained are higher, there is still considerable room for improvement. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17:271-279 © 2010 The European Society of Cardiology

[1]  K. Bestehorn,et al.  Contemporary trends in cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: patient characteristics, drug treatment, and risk-factor management from 2000 to 2005 , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[2]  Roland Chen,et al.  Inadequate control of hypertension in US adults with cardiovascular disease comorbidities in 2003-2004. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  Renata Cifkova,et al.  Erratum: Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and of the European Society of Cardiology (Journal of Hypertension (2007) 25, (1105-1187)) , 2007 .

[4]  A. Dominiczak,et al.  2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2007, European heart journal.

[5]  Theodore Speroff,et al.  Improving Blood Pressure Control through Provider Education, Provider Alerts, and Patient Education , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  S. Erdine,et al.  ESH-ESC Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension , 2006, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[7]  P. Donnan,et al.  Organisational factors in relation to control of blood pressure: an observational study. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  Sarah Corley,et al.  A Multimethod Quality Improvement Intervention To Improve Preventive Cardiovascular Care , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Educational outreach in diabetes to encourage practice nurses to use primary care hypertension and hyperlipidaemia guidelines (EDEN): a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  Paolo Ferrari,et al.  Reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment (RIAT): a primary care antihypertensive intervention study , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  Peter Bramlage,et al.  High prevalence and poor control of hypertension in primary care: cross-sectional study , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[13]  P. O’Connor Overcome clinical inertia to control systolic blood pressure. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  D. Berlowitz,et al.  Hypertension control: how well are we doing? , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. , 2003, JAMA.

[16]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  H. Hense,et al.  Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. , 2003, JAMA.

[18]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Role of organizational factors in poor blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the QuED Study Group--quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  M. Burnier Blood pressure control and the implementation of guidelines in clinical practice: can we fill the gap? , 2002, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  P. Lapuerta,et al.  Physician-related barriers to the effective management of uncontrolled hypertension. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  A. Chobanian Control of hypertension--an important national priority. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Grol,et al.  Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: clinical performance of general practitioners. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[23]  William Branch,et al.  Clinical Inertia , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Ward Hj,et al.  Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. , 1999 .

[26]  Bruce Neal,et al.  1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[27]  J. Holmen,et al.  Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[28]  H. Covvey,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care. , 1986, British medical journal.

[29]  R B Haynes,et al.  Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care. , 1986, JAMA.

[30]  L. Muhlbaier,et al.  Improving Hypertension Control: Impact of Computer Feedback and Physician Education , 1981, Medical care.

[31]  S. Oparil,et al.  Treatment of hypertension by computer and physician-a prospective controlled study. , 1977, Journal of chronic diseases.